Answer:
The stock will trade for 4.30 dollars in the market
Explanation:
The stock will be valued at the discounted value of their future cash flow.
w calculate the cas flow by multiplying by the grow rate given.
Then we discount using the present value of a lump sum:
Maturity $0.5000
time 3.00
rate 0.18
PV 0.30
Then, for the entire of the dividend after year 6th we use the gordon model:
dividends / (rate - grow) and then we discount that

Y# Cashflow Discounted
0 0
1 0
2 0
3 0.5 0.304315436
4 0.825 0.425525822
5 1.36125 0.595014921
6 1.4565375 2.971555503
Total 4.296411682
Answer:
8.038%
Explanation:
For the computation of the firm's WACC first we need to find out the cost of equity which is shown below:-
Cost of equity = Expected dividend ÷ (Price of the stock × (1 - Flotation cost)) + Growth rate
= $0.65 ÷ ($15.00 × (1 - 10%)) + 6.00%
= 10.81%
Now
WACC = Weight debt × (Cost of debt) × (1 - Tax rate) + Weight of equity × Cost of equity
= 45% × 7.75% × (1 - 40%) + 55% × 10.81%
= 8.038%
Answer:
The answer is: Rose will be taxed as receiving a $15,000 dividend distribution.
Explanation:
Since Parent Corporation owns 70% of Child Corporation, for tax purposes they are considered as one single firm. Rose is the main stockholder of Parent Co. so for tax purposes she is also a stockholder in Child Co. When Child Co. gives her $15,000 in exchange for Parent Co. stock, this would be considered as a dividend distribution rather a stock sale.
the answer i prefer is either A OR E ...cause without identifying the costs of a business u can't really run a bs successfully
Answer:
d. both countries, as whole, will be better off.
Explanation:
When countries leverage on their comparative advantages, they will be better off. In this instance as US has comparative advantage in producing airplanes, it will be more cost effective for them to produce and export to Japan.
So also Japan will find it cheaper to produce televisions and export to the US. Both contries reduce cost by producing goods they have comparative advantage in.