Answer: 4 times
Explanation:
GDP per capita is a way of measuring the wealth Distribution in a country. It is calculated by dividing the Gross Domestic Product by the population of the country. The aim usually is to see if the Country's economy is big enough considering the amount of people it has.
Country C has a GDP per capita of,
= 10,000/500
= $20
Country D has a GDP per capita of,
= 10,000/2,000
= $5
= 20/5
= 4
Country C has a GDP per capita that is 4 times that of C.
Answer:
a. True
Explanation:
Since small business has lesser processes and paper work as compare to the larger organizations where formal procedures are in placed
Answer:
This is not necessarily evidence that the proportion of Americans who are afraid to fly has decreaseddecreased because belowbelow 0.10 because the proportion of sample, is nothing very close to 0.10.
Explanation:
n = 1100
p = 0.10
Using the formula np(1-p), we will have
= 1100(0.10)*(1 - 0.10)
= 1100*0.10*0.90
= 99
99 ≥ 10
This satisfies normal distribution condition. That is, proportion of sample are normally distributed.
Answer: Increase / Gain of $36,000
Explanation:
Remeasurement loss, which arises from conversions of the various currencies used by the company to a functional currency, goes to the Income statement and is subtracted from the Net income.
Translation gains on the other hand, are added to the Other Comprehensive income.
The other comprehensive income will therefore increase by the translation gain of $36,000.
Answer:
The conception of man as an economic animal is implied by the view that economic production is the determining “factor” or “sphere” of man or society. Against this conception can be put another, that of man as praxis. This takes account of man as a creative being, capable of realizing his freedom through his own activity. In this article the theory of the determining role of the “economic factor”, and the theory of factors in general have been examined. The economic interpretation of history, a variant of the theory of factors, has been acknowledged as partly true for the self‐alienated man and society, but the theory of factors in any variant has been found inadequate as a general theory of man, or society. The possibility of freedom cannot be reduced to the fact that the determining roles played by “factors”, vary, or to the hope that the economic “factor” can be subordinated to a “better” one. Man's freedom consists in his resolving the conflict of “factors”, and in realizing himself as an integral creative being, no longer split into independent and mutually opposed spheres.
Explanation:
that should help
