Question

can someone please help me? (4 points) Which statement explains the significance of the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona?

Answer 1

Answer:

d

Explanation:

sdfvfv

Answer 2

Criminal suspects have the right to not give evidence against themselves. In Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court ruled that before being questioned by the police suspects, must be reminded of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.

• “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. Do you understand the rights I have just read to you? With these rights in mind, do you wish to speak to me?”

If you're in the following states: Indiana, New Jersey, Nevada, Oklahoma, and Alaska they will also say...

“We have no way of giving you a lawyer, but one will be appointed for you, if you wish, if and when you go to court.”

Hope this helps. HAVE A BLESSED AND WONDERFUL DAY! As well as a great Valentines Day! :-)  

- Cutiepatutie ☺❀❤