As part of the "Great Coastal Migration," the progenitors of the first Australians were among the first modern people to depart from Africa. Debatable, but generally speaking, the Great Coastal Migration left between 50 and 60,000 years ago. As the name suggests, this migration made its way from Africa via Arabia to India and Southeast Asia along the shore of the Indian Ocean. Sea levels were substantially lower back then. The huge islands off the coast of western Indonesia were really a massive peninsula known as Sunda. Australia, Tasmania, and Papua were all part of a one continuous landmass known as Sahul (in both cases "Sunda" and "Sahul" are modern names for these ancient landmasses, rather than ancient names that have lingered). However, water levels never decreased to the point that they could immediately connect the smaller Indonesian islands of Sunda and Sahul. (Check attachment for a map - for reference).
The Great Coastal Migration had to island hop their way through these little islands to reach Australia when they reached the eastern tip of Sunda. For this portion of the migration, boats or rafts were required, and they could have been required sooner if the Great Coast Migrants had departed Africa by the Horn rather than the Suez. However, we haven't yet discovered concrete proof of the type of watercraft that may have been created at the period. The oldest trustworthy indication of the existence of humans is found between 45 and 50,000 years ago in both Papua and mainland Australia. Historically speaking there's a wide diversity of small watercraft used by indigenous Australians (Check out the second attachment for another map reference); but 45-50,000 years ago is far to remote a time for this historical data to really be useful in telling us what sort of boats or rafts the first Australians used to make the final leg of their journey into Australia.
Answer:
There are a ton of likenesses and contrasts between the strict thoughts and practices of early India and the individuals who developed in the Nile stream valley and south West Asia. Religion had a significant impact in regular day to day existences inside the two societies. A few likenesses between the strict thoughts and practices would be that in both the way of life individuals used to love the sun, trees, and other life-supporting components of nature. Both have their strict sacred texts. Hindus had Vedaswhile Egyptians had their composed sacred writings on inside dividers of pyramids. The two religions accepted the thoughts and practices of these societies would be that in India, they accept that consuming the dead is a significant service for delivering the spirit from the physical structure. Egyptians then again, protect the bodies by transforming them into mummies. They accepted that the physical body would be significant in the following life. Another distinction is that perhaps the most grounded convention in antiquated Egyptian life was Divine Kingship. This was the conviction that the Pharaoh didn't like anything done as such.
Hopefully, this helped! Feel free to mark brainliest!
Answer:
By 661, Islam had spread as far north as the present-day regions of Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan and as far east as the eastern borders of ancient Persia (modern day Iran), even into areas of modern-day Afghanistan.
Explanation:
Pls brainliest me if it was helpful
Answer: on the monitor
Explanation:
Just for context, in computer class years ago they taught typing by blacking out the keys on the keyboard so you wouldn’t look at them and would have to memorize the placement.