The author is trying to portray that all parts are important even though some may come smaller or larger than other. Nothing could happen as planned without the smaller of bigger parts
A, c, d. A becuase it makes clarity. C becuase youre instructions entertainment and so on may be included while you listen. D because it causes better comparrison between what you and the other person think/ say.
<span>He uses Locke's argument that if a government or ruler goes against the wishes of a people, the people can revolt and set up a new government.
Jefferson basically outlines all the stuff King George III/British government did wrong against the colonies and so he says the colonies then had the natural right to change their governments</span>
C. where no considerable European settlement is possible
Though all the passage clearly expresses the author's idea to convey that British is superior to all countries, option C is the phrase that most clearly suggest that.
By using the words "no (...) is possible", the author expresses that normally people considered impossible/unfeasible a big European settlement in their lands, but since they are the British Empire, they are superiors and therefore they are the ones who can make it possible.
Answer:
- <em>D. There is no causation and almost no correlation between the football team playing at home and winning.</em>
Explanation:
The <em>correlation coefficient</em> is a measure of how strength is the relationship between two random variables. This measure quanitifes to what extent two random variables are associated or correlated.
The correlation coefficient can take values from - 1 to + 1.
A correlation coefficient of - 1 means a perfect, negative, linear linear correlation.
A correlation coefficient of + 1 means a perfect, positive, linear correlation.
A correlation coefficient of 0 means that the variables cannot be linearly correlated at all.
For intermediates values of the correlation coefficient, the variables are somewhat linearly correlated; the closer to ± 1 the stronger the correlation, the closer to 0, the weaker the correlation.
A correlatons coefficient of - 0.11 is pretty close to zero, meaning that the two variables, "the location of the game" and "the number of wins" are almost not correlated. Of course, much less could you think about a causation relationship between them.
