The statement " It eliminates the inflows of cash earned following the payback period and time value of money" is the disadvantage of the payback method
The payback period is the period thats tells the time period in which the initial investment that was made should be recovered.
It is to be measured in years normally.
For finding the disadvantage, we need to find out the following information related payback period
- It is easy to calculate
- The cash flows earned after the payback period should not be used
- There is no requirement to determine the present value factor for measuring the payback period.
- Also, it does not use for distinct cheap projects from lower ones
So this is the reason this method ignored the times value of money
Therefore, we can conclude that, the correct option is b.
Learn more about the payback method here: brainly.com/question/16255939
Answer:
The correct answer is
: Yes, the offer was revoked by Katherine.
Explanation:
Even if Paul replied Katherine with the acceptance to the first offer, he used a different means of communication to do that -<em>e-mail v. mail</em>. In addition, Katherine sent the revoke by mail -<em>as in the initial offer</em>- before Paul sent his e-mail. So, there is enough proof on Katherine's end that she didn't want to proceed with the offer before Paul confirmed his agreement on the terms. In that sense, Katherine did revoke the initial order.
Answer:
A. $153,000
Explanation:
The Journal Entry is shown below:-
Property Dr, $1,173,000
To Treasure stock $1,020,000
To additional paid-in-capital $153,000
The computation is given below:-
For Property
= 25,500 × $46
= $1,173,000
For Treasure stock
= 25,500 × $40
= $1,020,000
For Additional paid-in-capital
= $1,173,000 - $1,020,000
= $153,000
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Yes, but only to clarify the ambiguous contract terms
</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Breach of contract is a legitimate reason for activity and a sort of common wrong, wherein a sound understanding of anticipated trade isn't regarded by at least one of the gatherings to the agreement by non-execution or obstruction with the other party's presentation.
A material breach is the most genuine type of break of agreement. In these cases, somebody has failed to maintain their obligations as spread out in the contract. At the point when this happens, the harmed party can seek after harms in a standard suit. In the end, when a contractual worker finishes an undertaking yet isn't paid, this is viewed as a material breach.
