Answer:
Desing A is a better deal as the equivalent annual cost is lower than desing B
Anywa, bot desing cost are above the city collections thus, it cannot afford the sanitary systems unless it raises taxes
Explanation:
<em><u>Desing A </u></em>
F0 405,000
operating and maintenance cost 51,000 for 14 years
Present value of the operating and maintenance cost:
C = $ 51,000.00
time = 14 years
rate = 0.07
PV $446,018.8673
net worth: $ 851,081.87
equivalent annual cost:
PV 851,082
time 14
rate 0.07
C $ 97,316.904
<u><em>Desing B</em></u>
F0 251,000
operating and maintenance cost 89,000 for 14 years
C 89,000.00
time 14
rate 0.07
PV $778,346.6507
net worth: $ 1,029,346.65
equivalent annual cost:
C $ 117,700.580
Answer: A. low degree of substitutability.
Explanation:
Substitutability refers to the availability of alternative options to the variable in question. If something is said to be highly substitutable or to have a high degree of substitutability, then that means that it is easily replaceable because it has alternatives. The reverse holds true.
Therefore, Jamie can be said to have a low degree of substitutability because the client wants to deal with only him and if he is removed or unavailable, the company would not be able to deal with the client.
Answer:
can u tell me what it is and I'll help
Answer:
e. None of the above
Explanation:
The taxable asset purchases allows the individual to increase or step up the tax basis of acquired assets so as to reflect the price of the purchases made.
If one buy an assets, then he or she wants to allocate total purchase price in a way which gives a favorable postacquisition tax results.
In case of taxable asset purchases, the tax credits or the net operating losses cannot be transferred from the target firm to the acquiring firm.
Most private enterprise mainly run to gain profit
