1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jolli1 [7]
3 years ago
11

Nvm guys i got it, i just dunno how to delete so umm ya I'm doin dis...lol

English
1 answer:
Sergeeva-Olga [200]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

I think you go to edit your question and from there you can delete it lol

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What is the value of the elephant
IRISSAK [1]

Explanation:

In their report, iworry estimated the raw-ivory value of a poached elephant to be $21,000. In contrast, a living elephant is worth more than $1.6 million over its lifetime, largely because of its eco-tourism draw.

4 0
2 years ago
Is the following passage an example of expository writing?
Zepler [3.9K]
Yes it is a expository writing 

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write a narrative about a made up superhero
Elena-2011 [213]
Hhhhhh hhhhh hhhh hhhh h hh h h h h h  h 

8 0
3 years ago
Reading plus answers level j
yanalaym [24]

Answer:

whats the question, i'm sorry, i dont get it. ;-;

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
"These days, parents neglect to watch their children's social media use." This sentence is an example of which logical fallacy?
nignag [31]

In the sentence "These days, parents neglect to watch their children's social media use", we find an example of the hasty generalization fallacy.

Hasty generalization does not present enough evidence to support the argument made and, therefore, generalizes a fact. In the sentence above, there is an affirmation that parents do not watch their children's social media use. How can the speaker state this? Who are these parents: all of them? Just a percentage? What about the parents who do watch their kids' use of social media? Do they not count?

As for the other options given, let's take a look at a brief description of what they mean:

Non sequitur is when a conclusion does not follow the evidence presented. It's an absurd conclusion, considering the information given. --> People like watching movies. Movies have violence. Therefore, having some violence happen to people is desirable.

Post hoc is a fallacy in which the speaker assumes there is a connection between events simply because they happened one after the other. That is, if B happened after A, then B happened because of A. --> If it rained after I had an ice cream, then it rained because I had the ice cream.

False analogy happens when the speaker analyzes two different facts under the same point of view and conditions, drawing a conclusion that is far-fetched. --> Monica is from South America. Alice is also from South America. Therefore, Monica and Alice are from the same country.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the authors main argument in "an indian father's plea"?
    14·1 answer
  • WHY DO WE NEED TO LEARN A STORY ABOUT PEOPLE IN MISSISSIPPI?
    8·2 answers
  • With each other.<br>22) In marchant of venice where does happiness lies according to Nerrisa.​
    11·1 answer
  • The theme of a story is...
    5·1 answer
  • How do the narrator's expectations of life away from home affect his perspective of Mme. Kergaran? He thinks she acts too much l
    5·2 answers
  • Would you recommend living in a city or in the desert?
    10·1 answer
  • One ward to tell what the sentence is about the
    15·1 answer
  • Which kind of structure does this poem have?
    12·1 answer
  • Is the underlined word written in the positive, comparative, or superlative degree?
    5·1 answer
  • The word ''Couldn't'' its pronunciation is ''Koodent'' or ''Kuhdent'' or ''Kuhduht'' or ''Kooduhnt''?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!