Answer:
option (c) $25 million
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
The marginal propensity to consume in Frugalia, MPC = 0.60
Increase in spending = $10 million
Now,
The total increase in income
= 
× Increase in spending
on substituting the respective values, we get
= 
× $10 million
= 
× $10 million
or
= 2.5 × $10 million
or
= $25 million
Hence,
The answer is option (c) $25 million
Answer:
The correct answer is option (b).
Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follows:
first we calculate the predetermined OH, then
Predetermined OH rate = Estimated Manufacturing OH Cost ÷ Estimated Direct Labor Hours
= $451,140 ÷ 61,800
= 7.3
So, Applied MOH = 60,500 × 7.3 = $441,650
So, Underapplied OH = Actual MOH - Applied MOH
= $532,000 - $441,650
= $90,350 (under applied)
Answer:
Inheritance
Explanation:
The above question highlights example of inheritance. Whenever the ownership of business is transferred from one generation to another, it can be taken as an example of inheritance in a capitalist system.
The same has happened in the above question as well. Chet Bowes who owned his own lanscapped business has now transferred the ownership to his son Josh who has recently taken charge, now it is very much clear from the question neither Josh built the company on his own now was hired on the basis of his capabilities, the transfer happened on the basis of his relationship with the owner of the company. The question shows an example of inheritance.
A. Bid/no bid decision
A "bid" is what contractors call their proposals, and in some cases it will not be worth it to even submit a proposal on a job. The stage where contractors decide if it is worth it is called bid/no-bid.
Being and expert!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
