here's your answer dear friend❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
That means anybody in the world has the freedom to choose what religion they want to worship. So you could choose Hinduism or Christianity, you could chose any! :)
Autocracy, political belief system, and mass development that overwhelmed numerous pieces of focal, southern, and eastern Europe somewhere in the range of 1919 and 1945 and that additionally had followers in western Europe, the United States, South Africa, Japan, Latin America, and the Middle East. Europe's first extremist pioneer, Benito Mussolini, took the name of his gathering from the Latin word fasces, which alluded to a heap of elm or birch poles (as a rule containing a hatchet) utilized as an image of a correctional expert in old Rome.
Answer:
It is too far to read, please upload and I will answer :)
Explanation:
Aurangzeb did not respect his father and also throwed him to prison. Akbar was the third successor of the Bhabur the founder of the Mughal dynasty. Aurangzeb was the great grand son of Akbar and son of Shah jahan. Akabar did respected his parents and his Dynast and promoted the growth of his Dydnasty. He was one of the main reason why Mughal empire lost it’s power. Thus aurangzeb is totaly different from akbar. Mughal rulers', Akbar and Aurangzeb, policies were motivated by religious fluidity by Akbar who created a diverse, accepting, and highly successful empire while Aurangzeb's religious rigidity was the downfall of the Mughals. Akbar was very against having one religion in charge, eliminated the Jizya, made Persian the official language, established the Ibadat Khana and the Divine Faith in Fatehpur, combined religions. Aurangzeb returned to religious orthodoxy and reestablished the Jizya, resulted in revolts of sikhs and hindus and ultimately led to the downfall of the empire.
