Answer:
d. living paycheck to paycheck
Explanation:
Being financially stable means the ability to generate sufficient income to meet current and future expenditures. It means one can comfortably pay current bills, and have enough to meet for unexpected or emergency expenses. A financially stable person can afford the basic need as well secondary needs such as education, investments, and vacations with ease.
From the list provided, examples of financial stability will include the ability to save for the future, meet current bills, and not living paycheck to paycheck. Living from paycheck to paycheck means a person spends all his or her earnings within the month. In most cases, their monthly budgets exceed income. The individual may have slightly enough or insufficient resources to last them until the next payday.
Explanation:
probability and impact metrix is a tool for the project team iad in prioritizing risks.
Answer:
losing money
Explanation:
Helps save you from the out of pocket expense if something bad were to happen.
For example if your roof was damaged by a natural disaster it could cost thousnads of dollars out of a persons pocket.
Insurance will pay the cost to repair it allowing you to be protected from losing money.
some people say its true others say its false
I would say its false
hope this helps :)
Answer:
Under the UPA ( uniform partnership act ) the partners share the profits of the business according to their contributions towards the business ( mostly financial contribution)
The UPA is used to address the issues of profit and loss sharing in a business partnership based on financial contribution towards the business and not based on service rendered to the business hence it won't work in this situation
Explanation:
Under the UPA ( uniform partnership act ) the partners share the profits of the business according to their contributions towards the business ( mostly financial contribution), the primary purpose of the uniform partnership act to to address certain in-formal or formal issue that was not addressed under the business agreement reached between the partners,
The reason why the UPA might not govern the sharing of the profits is because of the involvement of a partner who did not contribute towards the capital but contributes in terms of service. The UPA is used to address the issues of profit and loss sharing in a business partnership based on financial contribution towards the business and not based on service rendered to the business hence it won't work in this situation
