Answer:
D). Their strict and strong opposition to slavery.
Explanation:
Salzburgers vary from the Malcontents during the Trustee era of Georgian history in their 'stern and strong resistance to slavery.' Salzburgers found slavery to be disgraceful and offensive against the principals of christianity. While the Malcontents perpetuated slavery for moving on with their plantation works and ammass huge land for these plantations. Thus, both of them were contradictory in their attitude towards slavery. The former strictly opposed it while the latter propagated it despite holding the prohibitions. Thus, <u>option D </u>is the correct answer.
Answer:
Askia Muhammad was a ruler who came to power after defeating sunni Ali's son and Mansa Musa was the ruler of the kingdom of Mali from 1312 C.E. to 1337 C.E. During his reign, Mali was one of the richest kingdoms of Africa, and Mansa Musa was among the richest individuals in the world,and Sundiata Keita was the first ruler of the Mali Empire from 1235 C.E. to 1255 C.E. Sundiata Keita, whose name means Lion Prince, was born early in the 13th century to a noble family within the Malinke people. ... He called his new kingdom the Mali Empire, which would become one of the richest empires in the world.
Explanation:
I did some research for you here you go love:)
Answer:
George Washington
Explanation:
George Washington was an American soldier, statesman, a Found Father, and the first president of the United States of America.
Answer:
A trade association is the kind of international organization that would most benefit this nation.
Explanation:
Small nations generally do not have large economic output or global supremacy in the production of any specific or specific service. Therefore, its presence and importance in world markets is not so important, and in case it needs to compete with larger nations, it cannot do it by its own means because it does not have the necessary economic volume to affirm its presence in the market.
Therefore, to help these nations stabilize economically and commercially, the largest and most dominant nations often enter into trade agreements with them to help them progress.
Being made president the three cuts i would mare would be in the following areas, taxes, Government spending and cut unnecessary ministries or departments.
The fist big cut I would make would be tax cuts, the reason for this is the less taxes are charged on the populaiton the more money said population will have to spend on goods and services adn thus circulate in the economy. This would also mean less tax breaks for the wealthly, thus removing their privileges of avoiding taxes through charities.
The second big cut I would make would be in government spending, or more specifically reducing or cutting the salaries of career politicians by 30% to 40%. This is becasue the government with is the largest spender of capital in any given country while being the lowest producer of capital and it is unsustainable to maintain large political salaries. With this cut it would not only alleviate the tax payer, but also free up remaining funds for health and educaiton.
Finally the last cuts I would make would be in the area of departments or ministries. While some such as the department of Agriculture and Interior incompatible and cannot be fused, other such as the departmetn of labour and Treasury can be fused, reducing the number of departments and thus overall government spending again.
These are the three be cuts I would make as President.
