Two the answer is the second one
Answer:
The following explains the outcome and significance of the District of Columbia v. Heller case,
The Supreme Court decided in favor of Heller, that the Second Amendment allows law-abiding U.S. citizens to own and carry handguns in the district.
Explanation: In the 2008 landmark Supreme Court Case The District of Columbia v. Heller, it was found that the Second Amendment allows LAW ABIDING citizens to own and carry handguns in the District of Columbia (Washington, DC). This case found the Firearms Control Regulation Act of 1975 as unconstitutional. The Act of 1975 called for handguns used for home and self defense to be unloaded, disassembled, and/or locked.
Well, All I know is that In the south they were mostly plantations, thus the need for slaves. And in the north, it was mostly city, with a few SMALL farms
I believe that statement is: true
They do this by finding the material that left on the crime scenes that might give the law enforcement clues on the perpetrator and the technique of the digital crime. Everytime people conduct a digital activity, we would most likely left some sort of digital trail that could be used to lead us to the perpetrator.
