1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tresset_1 [31]
3 years ago
9

Considering that the Preamble to the Constitution states that part of forming a more perfect union is to establish justice, what

did Martin Luther King, Jr., mean when he said that "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"? A. If even one person is affected by injustice, everyone is affected. B. If one nation treats people equally, then all nations need to treat people equally. C. Justice is always reasonable, fair, and impartial. D. Justice is only as good as the judges who hear cases.
History
1 answer:
vivado [14]3 years ago
5 0

<u>ANSWER:</u>

The correct answer is A. is "If even one person is affected by injustice, everyone is affected".

<u>EXPLANATION:</u>

  • Marti Luther King, Jr. was a prominent leader of the "American Civil Rights Movement" that took place during the 1950s and 1960s. He is remembered as a "legendary American figure" in the face of racism and injustice.
  • When he said that “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice anywhere", he meant that if one person is affected by injustice, everyone is affected.
  • It is because justice should be provided to any rightful citizen and if one doesn’t get justice the others might fear its heir turn next.

You might be interested in
What alliances and events contributed to the outbreak of world war ii?
Eva8 [605]

Austria felt that Serbia was overreaching its territorial boundaries and that the only way to forestall it was a preventive war. The death of Ferdinand provided a convenient excuse to go to war with Serbia. In support of Serbia, Russia mobilized its forces against Austria-Hungary, who had declared war on Serbia. Germany declared war on Russia. The United Kingdom and France, allies of Russia, also entered the conflict.

A web of alliances existed between many European countries. Austria allied with Germany, and Serbia allied with Russia. The alliances obligated each country to go to war on behalf of its allies. This dragged more and more countries into the war. The war pitted the Central Powers, consisting of Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire and Bulgaria, against the Allied Powers, consisting of the United Kingdom, France, Russia and Italy. The United States ultimately entered the war on the Allied side.

4 0
3 years ago
• What were the major issues (1947-1958) that became the reason of military intervention in Pakistan for the first time? Justify
eimsori [14]

Answer:

The reasons why military had to intervene in Pakistan was because the current government had administrative problems and had inadequate staff and resources, a huge refugee problem and poor infrastructure.

Explanation:

Since it was a newly formed state, Pakistan faced a lot of problems after the death of their leader. Few reasons why military had to intervene are listed below:

•Muslim league had incompetent people and administration failed to handle things.

•The states were in shambles. They had poor infrastructure.

•There was a huge refugee problem.

•The resources were limited.

•The states were conflicted.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What location was the center of music and other intellectual activities in Europe from 1400 to 1450?
IgorC [24]
<span>Burgundy.............</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Who overthrew charles x in france in 1830 and what kind of government was established
poizon [28]
Give me some time to think about this please.
4 0
3 years ago
World war i was known as a "total war" because it involved the efforts of many civilians in addition to the military. today, how
Sati [7]
If the story of "All Quiet on the Western Front" was told today, the story would be much different, especially if it was told from the viewpoint of an American soldier involved in the War on Terror. First, the protagonist would not be coming from a nation that is in a state of total war.  The War on Terror is a limited war and does not require the undivided focus of the American government, industry, and economy.  A soldier, today, would likely be volunteering to join the military, instead of being all but forced to like the characters in "All Quiet on the Western Front."  Second, the total detachment the soldiers in "All Quiet on the Western Front" feel from their civilian lives would not be as pronounced, given how today's soldiers are able to communicate with their friends and family back home by way of email, online chat, and quicker postal service.  Thirdly, today's American soldiers are provided with far better and more extensive military training than the soldiers in "All Quiet on the Western Front" are, hence they would be more prepared for the combat experiences they must endure. 
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In 1992, pakistan amended its constitution and made the _______ the supreme law of the land.
    6·1 answer
  • Why did England not encourage the development of manufacturing in the colonies?
    6·1 answer
  • In late 1942, U. . and British troops attacked the German army in ? a)poland b)north africa c)france d)Switzerland
    10·1 answer
  • How could analyzing political themes help you connect the modern United States to earlier civilizations?
    7·1 answer
  • For the following question, refer to the table of contents for H.R.5.
    13·1 answer
  • 11. Label each person in the painting:
    7·1 answer
  • Why did immigrants face prejudice in America?
    5·2 answers
  • The Great Compromise proposed by the committee headed by Roger Sherman called for a two-house Congress. a two-house Congress. ba
    9·1 answer
  • 41. Powers of Congress are controlled by the President<br> A. True<br> B. False
    10·1 answer
  • How did World war 2 affect society international
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!