Out of the three movements, the independence of India was the one that required the least amount of fighting. India achieved its independence in a peaceful manner through the adoption of the ideas of civil disobedience. However, although the process of independence was initially peaceful and led to a straight-forward retreat of the British, its aftermath was more complicated. In the aftermath of independence, India was fragmented into India and Pakistan, with Bangladesh separating from Pakistan later on.
In the case of Latin America, there were several movements that took place at different times. However, several of this were unified thanks to the figure of Simon Bolivar. The conflicts that took place were a lot more violent than those of India. Moreover, fragmentation was also more significant, as these resulted in the creation of several new countries.
Finally, the independence of the United States took place much earlier than these other independence movements. The independence of the Thirteen Colonies was one of the earliest movements for independence to take place. However, it did not lead to the creation of a country. Instead, it led to the creation of a union or a confederacy of several separate colonies, united through some common ties and documents, such as the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation.
It is D because my science class had just went over that
It must have been his son
In reality yes and no. The assassination of Franz Ferdinand did occur in the Balkans, and was the result of a situation in the Balkans. However Franz Joseph declared war for other reasons as well. This is a topic I encourage you to research on your own. Not only if the cause came truly from the Balkans, but also if it was really "foolish".
The Great War channel on youtube has a lot of educational and helpful content regarding world war one's causes if you look for their "Prelude to war" specials in their channel.