Idi Amin Dada was a violent dictator responsible for several atrocities during his reign.
Yes they should.
1. Enables them to get rid of stage fright
2. They can express emotions through a different medium
3. They have control of what type of plays they would like to perform.
Base on the behavior of Carlos, the best approach that will
explain the behavior that he has shown would empathy altruism hypothesis. This
is where a person has the ability of feeling empathy in other people and tries
to put themselves in their situation, where in they try to be more
understanding and tries to share the same emotion that the person would feel
because of the situation that he or she is in. It is also with this, it makes a
person help the other party without expecting anything from return and helping
them because he or she wants to and not because he or she is expecting anything
or is only obliged to do it. It is seen from Carlos actions as he helps the
woman who has been begging for alms and tries to put himself into her shoes
where he felt pain into seeing her go through in that situation.
Answer:
C). When participants later completed the task alone.
Explanation:
Muzafer's proposed his study of social conformity for which he selects the autokinetic effect and reveals that 'informational social influence'(as a stimulus) can help the participants estimate the portion of the movement of dot light as 'they were avoiding public embarrassment.'
As per the question, Sherif can counter this study when he discovered similar results 'when participants later completed the task alone' without any kind of informational social influence or ambiguous stimulus. This contradicts Sherif's study and hence, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
The description of the given question is described in the explanation section below.
Explanation:
A day, my child said, "You're very much loud as well as disturbing." When he was on the mobile device, I told him an interesting issue. He posted this comment just after the mobile. It was bullying me.
- I have worked hard with my families all my existence. I have always provided about my child and just never refused any of his requests. I rarely gave him any sort of frustration or frustration. He's founded right now, and I've done all for his government. I figured my son was going to appreciate my commitment.
- And therefore his demeaning speaking upset me. I couldn't contain myself, so I was curious about what I had in my life to do with such selfish commitment to my career. Although he posted this statement, there has been a tone of frustration, negligence, disrespect, negligence, respectively. It confirms, of course, that he created this remark to harm me.
- I had been so stunned I was lost for words. I was complaining to my wife. But it wasn't that bad. I walked out the door from him because he dropped into one room. I was always realizing that my entire career was pointless.
