At the beginning of the U.S. Civil War, both sides were very confident in a quick and easy victory. I can see why the North would think so: they had a better trained army, better infrastructure (including many more miles of railroad), and superior industry.
Answer:
It can stop it from being killed due to a local "disaster", like a fire, for example.
Explanation:
By planting seeds far from the parent plant, you are increasing the probability the genetics from the plant will survive because they are further from one another. So, for example, let's say there is a forest fire, if they are close to one another, both the parent plant and seeds are likely to perish. If they are separated by space, potentially one of the two won't be in the path of the fire and will survive.
Rather than taking time and effort for expert craftsmen to create long-lasting and expensive goods, companies in the US could now create products of a lesser quality by the thousands daily in huge factories, and they could charge for products which would consequently last less as well. It was technically good for the economy when looked at from a monetary perspective, though consumers may see it as a bad thing since the products aren't as well-made.
Hope that I helped!
1) Animal intelligence can never be compared to human intelligence.
2) It's a mistake to give an animal a tool or a gadget and consider it intelligent if it starts using it.
3) What is intelligent in a human context may be meaningless in an animal context.
4) Animal intelligence is the capacity they develop to adapt and survive in different environments.
Answer:
i dont know what did you call the dog crossing the street.
Explanation:
