Answer:
I disagree
'No it won;t
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the inequality functions;
-2(3 – x) > 2x – 6
Open the parenthesis
-2(3) -2(-x) > 2x - 6
-6 + 2x > 2x - 6
Collect like terms
2x-2x > -6 + 6
0x > 0
x > 0/0
<em>The value of x does not exist on any real number. I disagree with my friend since the value of x is an indeterminate function. If the inequality were ≥, it won't change anything as the value of x won't still exist on any real number </em>
<em></em>
Answer: 0.45
Step-by-step explanation:
As stated by the statement, isometric means same measure. So, when a rigid transformation occurs all the measures of the original figure (which will be transformed) will be the same of the new figure (the result of the transformation).
That means that you can verify that the transformation used was rigid by checking the measures of both (original and transformed) figures: if and only if the meausures of the final figure are the same of the original figure the transformation was rigid.
Answer:
What are we trying to slove?
Step-by-step explanation:
Yes I think because sum means adding so if you add 8 by a number you get bigger answers and if you add 4 by something it give you smalls numbers well I think is yes but I really don't know
