Explanation:
the federal receive the common thing
Answer:
See the explanation below.
Explanation:
The court likely to rule in favor of Ewing.
The reason is that the enough consideration that gives backing to a promise in this case is generally the waiver of a legal right to eat to obesity as requested by the other party.
The evidence that Ewing has lost 154 pounds in weight over the stipulated period is a consideration that sufficient enough under the law. The payment of $10 pound that Ewing has lost is a promise. The fact that Ewing also benefit from the weight loss does not matter.
Answer: The correct answer is "D. the benefit of lower prices to be greater than the cost of reduced services and less convenience.".
Explanation: Consumers obviously consider the benefit of lower prices to be greater than the cost of reduced services and less convenience.
Discount and no-frills airlines have less costs to cover so they can offer lower and more affordable prices for consumers. These airlines have been successful because it turns out that consumers value or prefer the lower price rather than the additional services.
Answer:
c. there is a negative externality.
Explanation:
At the time when one individual actions develops the benefits for others but at the same time they dont pay so it is to be known as positive externality
At the time when one individual action develops loss but the other who received the loss because of the action of the person so for this they didnt get the compensation so it is the negative externality
As we can see that there is three types of values so the correct option is c.
Answer:
I believe this would be in the Engineering and technology pathway.
Explanation:
Examples of someone in a engineering and technology pathway are people like Biomedical engineers so it makes sense!
