Yes, this is correct.
Authority is usually a good thing, for example the elected President of the Unites States has the authority people people gave him the authority.
On the other hand, coercion is seen rather as a negative concept and a problem (and can be corrected to bullying)
Here is the full description of the country:
<em>A small country makes all of its laws through popular vote. When a law is proposed, all citizens have the opportunity to vote to support or oppose it. If a majority of voters support a proposal, it becomes law. Citizens are generally happy that their laws directly reflect their opinions. However, some resent having to spend so much time researching political issues, and others worry that majority groups might</em><span><em>use the system to pass laws discriminating against minorities.
</em>I believe the answer is: Direct democracy
<em>
</em>In direct democracy, the citizens of a country is directly involved in the law making process. Which means they can <u><em>directly vote </em></u>for the type of law and legislation that they want. This is different from united states where citizens vote for the <u><em>representatives </em></u>that involved in the voting of the legislations</span><span><em>
</em></span>
Answer: Projection.
Explanation:
This is the defense mechanism by which people disguise threatening impulses by attributing them to others.
Answer:
heterotypic continuity
Explanation:
According to the given situation. It is mentioned in the question that Brett has a lot of energy for the social gatherings and at the time of adult he makes a point for talking.
This determines that he has different behaviors at different ages
Therefore in the given case, it is a case of heterotypic continuity and the same is to be considered