Answer: I read the text and it seems perfect and I think you don't need to add anything else.
Explanation:
Analyzing the task and the way you responded it seems to me that you did it well. You were precise in each of the years. I think you should not add more since it would be a bit more extensive and the important thing about this task is to point out the most important events of each year. In my opinion, I wouldn't change anything, I think it's very good.
I could also see that you used the connectors that the statement showed. You have followed the instructions very well. Congratulations!
Answer:
The first response
Explanation:
The first response is the only claim that makes sense. To check, let's use the process of elimination.
Second: Calling the scientists' surveys unsophisticated is irrelevant and does not prove that the original claim is correct.
Third: This option does not address the points made by the counterclaim and instead pushes the original idea. It is important to remember that it is supposed to be a response, not a new statement.
Fourth: This response gives up on the original idea and ends the debate, with the counterclaim winning.
This would be i<span>ntransitive.
Have a nice day :-)
</span>