Answer: A concept known as Present Value of Growth Opportunities (PVGO) offers analysts a distinct method of appraisal. Given current stock values...
Explanation: Where is PVGO located?
PVGO is the value of a stock minus the earnings-to-cost ratio.
This strategy is predicated on the idea that businesses need to distribute profits to shareholders in the absence of a better use for them, such as investing in projects with a positive Net Present Value (NPV).
What is a stock's PVGO?
The portion of a company's share price that reflects forecasts for future profits growth is known as PVGO. The abbreviation "PVGO" stands for "present value of growth opportunities."
To know more about stock's pvgo visit;
https://brainly.in/question/4006268?
#SPJ4
The best ground on which the defendant ( Company S ) can dismiss the suit filed by the plaintiff (Company T) is the standing to sue.
<h3>What is standing to sue?</h3>
Standing to sue refers to a situation where the plaintiff who has filed the case must prove with appropriate proof of having damages or injuries in respect of the conduct of the defendant.
In the provided case, Company T has to prove that the products of Company S are actually defective through appropriate evidence. If Company T can't able to prove their alleged claim before the court, then the case is decided in the favor of the defendant party, that is, Company S.
Therefore, the standing to sue can be used as a ground by Company S for dismissing the claim of Company T.
Learn more about the standing to sue in the related link:
brainly.com/question/14820416
#SPJ4
A bilateral is a formal agreement between two or more governments!
Did you ever find the answer?
Answer:
Its action would be optimal given an ordering cost of $28.31 per order
Explanation:
According to the given data we have the following:
economic order quantity, EOQ= 55 units
annual demand, D=235
holding cost per one unit per year, H=40%×$11=$4.4
ordering cost, S=?
In order to calculate the ordering cost we would have to use the following formula:
EOQ=√(<u>2×D×S)</u>
(H)
Hence, S=<u>(EOQ)∧2×H</u>
2×D
S=<u>(55)∧2×4.4</u>
2×235
S=<u>13,310</u>
470
S=$28.31
Its action would be optimal given an ordering cost of $28.31 per order
