1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dominik [7]
3 years ago
14

Using the theory of continental drift, scientists have proposed that about 200 million years ago the continents were once joined

together in a supercontinent called
A. Pangaea.
B. Panthalassa.
C. Laurasia.
D. Gondwanaland.
History
2 answers:
Anon25 [30]3 years ago
6 0
200 years ago the continents split otherwise known as pangaea
monitta3 years ago
5 0
The correct answer is Pangaea which is a <span>A former “super-continent” on the Earth. In the distant past a large landmass, </span>Pangaea<span>, included all the present continents, which broke up and drifted apart it is now 7 smaller continents </span><span />
You might be interested in
Why did the "irreconcilable" senators oppose the Versailles Treaty?
Maslowich
I dont know this one sorry
3 0
3 years ago
Which identifies the effect of the Pact of Steel?
Digiron [165]
The answer would be B
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The two political parties in Mexico before the Texas Revolution were the _____ and the ______?
kondaur [170]

Answer:

texians and tejanos

Explanation:

go to www.britannica.con for more information

6 0
2 years ago
Can someone give me the answers thank you
Aneli [31]
Which question is do you want me to answer
7 0
3 years ago
How would Federalists most likely respond to this?
aleksklad [387]

For the Federalists, their <u>most likely response</u> is D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.

<h3>Who were the Federalists?</h3>

The Federalists were American Founding Fathers who wanted a strong government and strong executive branch.

The Federalists were opposed by the anti-Federalists who wanted a weaker central government.

The Federalists did not vote for a bill of rights because they regarded the constitution as sufficient, unlike the anti-Federalists who demanded a bill of rights to be part of the Constitution.

Thus, for the Federalists, their <u>most likely response</u> is D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.

Learn more about Federalists and Anti-Federalists at brainly.com/question/267094

#SPJ1

7 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are 17 things that describe snow?
    14·1 answer
  • Who was Chai Ling? How did she feel about the student protests in Tiananmen Square?
    11·2 answers
  • Once an election has moved past the primary stage, a political party’s role changes. All of the following are roles of political
    7·2 answers
  • Who was Joseph Stalin? What did he do?
    6·1 answer
  • Focus of sitcoms-divorce/minorities, family problems etc in the 1950s tv entertainment
    14·2 answers
  • Do you think the compromise of 1850 was a good solution
    8·1 answer
  • What author define poetry as the spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings from emotions recollectivization Tranqulity
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELPPPP!!! How did both the Federalists and the Anti-federalists contribute to the ultimate success and strength of the C
    13·1 answer
  • What was the major purpose of otis pamphlet​
    5·1 answer
  • How did the United States mobilize prior to joining World War II?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!