The answer is the first chapter in the Bible it is Genesis. Hope this helps.
The right answer is C. attention, need, satisfaction, visualization, action. This is a sequence created by Alan Monroe in 1930 when he was working at Purdue University. This is a technical sequence created for the creation and planning of persuasive speeches that aim to inspire people to act. The sequence of steps indicates that you must first achieve the attention of the people, establish the problem to finally invite action.
I hope my answer can help you.
Bandura states that if someone is confident in performing a task, they most likely have <u>high self-efficacy</u> in regard to that particular task.
<h3>Who was Albert Bandura?</h3>
He was an Canadian-American psychologist that worked at Stanford University as a Professor Emeritus of social science in psychology and philosophy of action.
In 1997, he published his book titled "Self-Efficacy which entails The Exercise of Control" which typically deals with an individual's belief in his or her own competence.
According to this book, if someone is confident in performing a task, they most likely have high self-efficacy in regard to that particular task.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about Albert Bandura
brainly.com/question/21655539
#SPJ1
Two landmark decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court served to confirm the inferred constitutional authority for judicial review in the United States: In 1796, Hylton v. United States was the first case decided by the Supreme Court involving a direct challenge to the constitutionality of an act of Congress, the Carriage Act of 1794 which imposed a "carriage tax".[2]
The Court engaged in the process of judicial review by examining the
plaintiff's claim that the carriage tax was unconstitutional. After
review, the Supreme Court decided the Carriage Act was not
unconstitutional. In 1803, Marbury v. Madison[3]
was the first Supreme Court case where the Court asserted its authority
for judicial review to strike down a law as unconstitutional. At the
end of his opinion in this decision,[4]
Chief Justice John Marshall maintained that the Supreme Court's
responsibility to overturn unconstitutional legislation was a necessary
consequence of their sworn oath of office to uphold the Constitution as
instructed in Article Six of the Constitution.
