Answer:
Within-group factorial design
Explanation:
Within-group factorial design: This is the design in all the participant gets an opportunity to get all the treatment or have to exposed to the condition. The different levels of the independent variables indicated the treatment condition. These variables are manipulated by the experimenter and these variables are treated with a dependent variable that is critical and responsible for the treatment. It is beneficial for two or more groups that are tested under different factors. In this design error variance reduced. In this type of experiment, the individual is assigned for independent variables or treatments.
Answer:
While Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution sets up the ability of the president to select the heads of the executive departments, it was President George Washington who established the “Cabinet” as his group of advisers who reported in private and solely to the U.S. chief executive officer.
Explanation:
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
Answer: i'm pretty sure its Making informed decisions when voting
Explanation: that's all :)
