Answer:
merge law and equity
Explanation:
In resolving labour related or welfare issues the best way to do so will be to hear the grievances of the striking workers and try to find an equitable solution to the situation.
However if all reasonable avenues have been pursued and they still don't want to comply, then legal measures can be taken to make them work.
In this scenario Reginald should call the striking workers and try to come to an equitable solution for the business and workers where there will be a win-win.
If this does not work he can use the law to compel them to comply.
According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.
The provided statement is true.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.
In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.
Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.
Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/2516239
#SPJ1
Answer:
The combined wage bracket tables in Exhibits 9-3 and 9-4 is missing hence I will use 2014 tax year
answer :
a) Federal income tax withheld
= 75.6 + ( 1989.60 - 944 )*15% = $232.44
b) social security
6% * 1989.6 = $119.38
c) Medicare
1.45% * 1989.6 = $28.85
Explanation:
For a single individual
Two withholding allowance = $329.20 * 2 = $658.40
Gross Pay = $2648
withholding allowance = $658.40
Subject to withholding = $2648 - $658.40 = $1989.60
a) Federal income tax withheld
= 75.6 + ( 1989.60 - 944 )*15% = $232.44
b) social security
6% * 1989.6 = $119.38
c) Medicare
1.45% * 1989.6 = $28.85
The quadratic function that best models the developing economies' share of the global GDP as a function of the number of years
One thing that can cause a shift in the demand curve is a change in one of the determinants of demand.
The law of demand can be shown as Pat wants to buy more candy bars at $1 than at $2
<h3>What does the law of demand say?</h3><h3 />
The law of demand posits that people will demand more of a good when the price is lower as opposed to when it is higher. This is why Pat will want to buy more candy bars when the price is lower at $1 as opposed to $2.
The demand curve will shift when there is a change in one of the determinant of demand such as the income of people and the price of substitutes.
Find out more on the law of demand at brainly.com/question/24500422
#SPJ1
