All categories

3 years ago

According to Krugman, which of the following best indicates the dangers of a strategic trade policy?

Business

1 answer:

Gwar [14]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

C.Occurrence of a trade war

Explanation:

Strategic Trade Policy depicts policy adopted by certain countries to effect strategic interactions between firms in an international oligopoly. These include policy instruments (export subsidy, import tariff) by trying to shift profits from international to domestic firms.It is likely to develop their firms status in international markets & raise level of domestic welfare.

Many economists are skeptical about government's analytical capacity to determine optimal amount of intervention, as per theory application. If non optimal (over protection intervention) is used, it might lead to risk retaliation by other international firms & action reaction leads to occurrence of trade (commercial) war.

You might be interested in

When shipments from a number of sources are combined into one larger shipment going to a single location, the operation is known

Anit [1.1K]

When shipments from a number of sources are combined into one larger shipment going to a single location, the operation is known as warehouse consolidation.

Product Shipments means, for each Performance Period, the quantitative and measurable number of units of a particular Product shipped during that Performance Period.

Cargo is a word used as a noun to describe goods being transported. Shipping is a word that is used both as a noun and as a verb. When used as a verb, it includes the word ship and thus refers to the actual transportation of goods, not necessarily by sea.

Total shipments represent the quantity shipped by regular shippers or the quantity paid by regular shippers during the base period, whichever is greater.

Learn more about shipments here:brainly.com/question/12887070

#SPJ4

7 0

1 year ago

When courts find accountants liable for constructive fraud, the implication is that:______.

barxatty [35]

Even if they were unaware of the fraud, accountants may be held accountable for it.

<h3>How does constructive fraud work?</h3>

A legal fable known as "constructive fraud" describes a circumstance in which a person or organization obtained an unfair advantage over another using dishonest or unjust means. As opposed to true fraud, no proof of intent is required. The failure to inform clients of product flaws is one example of unfair practices.

The elements are:

1) a duty owed by the party to be charged to the complaining party due to their relationship;

2) violation of that duty by making deceptive material misrepresentations of past or current facts or remaining silent when a duty to speak exists; and

3) reliance on such statements by the complaining party.

To know more about fraud visit:

https://brainly.in/question/51948586

#SPJ4

7 0

2 years ago

The Mighty Power Tool Company has the following accounts on its books: Customer Amount Owed ($) Age (days) ABC $47 comma 150

frez [133]

Answer:

Accounts receivable more than 60 days = $39,500

% of accounts receivable = 11.07%

Explanation:

The following table shows the aging schedule-

Customer Amount Owed ($) Age (days)

ABC $47,150 32

DEF 37,500 7

GHI 18,900 14

KLM 72,000 28

NOP 41,450 43

QRS 16,000 11

TUV 84,300 58

WXY 39,500 75

We have to develop a schedule with a 15 days incremental through 60 days. And we show which customers are falling in that category -

0-15 (DEF + GHI + QRS) = $(37,500 + 18,900 + 16,000) = $72,400

16-30 (KLM) = $72,000

31-45 (ABC + NOP) = $(47,150 + 41,450) = $88,600

46-60 (TUV) = $84,300

Over 60 (WXY) = $39,500

Accounts receivable more than 60 days = $39,500

Percentage of Accounts receivable = $\frac{39,500}{72,400+72,000+88,600+84,300+39,500}$

= 11.07%

8 0

2 years ago

Katangian ng mega sardines

Deffense [45]

Answer:

The day I was in the shower and I will be there at remove the

3 0

3 years ago

Net income for the year for Carrie, Inc. was $750,000, but the statement of cash flows reports that net cash provided by operati

dybincka [34]

Answer:

The difference might relate to depreciation, loss on sale of fixed assets, or change in working capital.

Explanation:

The net cash flow from operating activities is calculated after adding and deducting certain items and adjustments to net income to get operating cash flow.

First of all, the gains or losses from sale of fixed assets are adjusted, losses are added back and gains are deducted, to get income from operations.

All the non cash transactions that is unrealized gains or losses are eliminated.

Depreciation being non cash is added back.

All the changes in working capital is adjusted.

Increase in value of current assets are deducted, decrease in value of current assets are added, increase in current liability is added and decrease in current liabilities is deducted.

Thus, after all these adjustments the cash flow from operating activities is calculated.

In the given instance also, the difference might relate to depreciation, loss on sale of fixed assets, or change in working capital.

3 0

3 years ago