Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that union membership increased.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 400
p = 12.5% = 0.125
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of women belonging to union , x = 52
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
The null hypothesis sates that 12.5% of U.S. workers belong to union and the alternate hypothesis states that there is a increase in union membership.
This is a one-tailed(right) test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.3812
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that union membership increased.
Answer:
sorry I can't help you. ...............
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
$5504
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that :
Principal amount = $500
Interest = 4% simple interest annually
Amount added at the end of each year :
First year:
Principal + (Principal * rate * time)
500 + (500 * 0.04) = 520
$520 + $250 = $770
2nd year:
770 + (770 * 0.04) = $800.80
$800.80 + $250 = 1050.80
3rd year:
1050.8 + (1050.8 * 4) = 5254
$5254 + 250 = $5504
Answer:
y-1=2(x+4) or y=2x+9
Step-by-step explanation:
y - 3 = 2(x + 7)
y=mx+b
m=2
(x1,y1) -> (-4, 1)
(y−y1)=m(x−x1)
plug in
y-1=2(x+4)
y-1=2x+8
y=2x+9
test:
(1)=2(-4)+9
1=-8+9
1=1