The supreme court introduced a two-part test, known as the "Sherbert" test (or balancing test) to determine whether the government was violating an individual's "free exercise" of religion.
The Sherbert test guarantees that government doesn't take unjustified activities that obstruct a man's religious flexibility. The United States court framework has embraced the Sherbert test to decide whether the legislature has fittingly allowed or denied joblessness benefits in light of the job one's religion had in his or her job loss.
The test causes the courts to decide whether the individual's case of having a true religious conviction is exact and if the administration's activities load a man's capacity to follow up on his or her convictions. Moreover, the test requires the administration to decide whether it has acted to the state's advantage and on the off chance that it has done as such in a way that is slightest prohibitive to a man's religion.
A. Computers have become smaller and more efficient.
Answer:
The information provided in the article 'Ranger killed during rescue of climbers on Mount Rainier,' supports the argument found in the interview 'Helicopter Rescues Increasing on Everest.'
Explanation:
"Ranger killed during rescue of climbers on Mount Rainier" is an article published in The Seattle Times on June 21, 2012. The article provides information about Nick Hall, a climbing ranger, who lost his life while rescuing a climber on Mount Rainier. The article informs about the life-risking jobs of the climbing ranger.
In the interview, "Helicopter Rescues Increasing on Everest," Nick Heil talks about the risk involved in rescuing. Nick Heil shares one incident in which the helicopter crashed while rescuing one climber.
Therefore, both the text talks about the risk involved in the rescue operation to such high altitudes.
Textual evidence:
<em>"“We sincerely hope the loss of our son will draw appropriate attention to the hazards and safety requirements and commitment to be involved in the profession and sport he so loved,..." </em>(from "Ranger killed during rescue of climbers on Mount Rainier")
<em>"The accident that I describe in the beginning of the story, is on a peak called Ama Dablam. And the helicopter flies up to about 19,000 feet and, you know, the air at this altitude is very thin. So it requires a helicopter to utilize more power to stay aloft up there. So, you know, you can imagine, if you add weight, it’s going to lose lift. So in this case, they could only bring one climber at a time. And they got one climber off, and they crashed attempting to rescue the second man."</em> (from "Helicopter Rescues Increasing on Everest"
<em />
Answer:
The following are the components of an ideal society:
1. Universal Access to Human Essentials
2. Environmental Sustainability
3. Balance
4. Equity and fairness
5. Access to Other Desirable Items
6. Freedom and Liberty
Universal Access to Human Essentials
Each individual requires certain things to live: air, water, food, assurance from unforgiving climate (apparel and asylum), and security from hurt. In a decent society, everybody would have her essential human requirements met.
This appears to be rudimentary, however a few thinkers and legislators have contended that fantastic everybody's essential human requirements isn't basic. They contend that some more prominent ideals must be accomplished by permitting or compelling a few people to be down and out. They esteem these more noteworthy products more than general admittance to necessities.
Environmental Sustainability
People have developed for a very long time firmly connected to nature. We are adjusted to the world's current circumstance and can live very well in it. A decent society would work flawlessly with the common habitat, keeping up and supporting normal frameworks. We would live in consonance with any remaining species.
Explanation:
Since each individual has her own meaning of an ideal society, there can't be a solitary, general norm there are in any event the same number of definitions as there are individuals. Just in an autocracy would one be able to singularly choose what comprised the components of an ideal society and force this definition on others. Unquestionably, the vast majority would concur that having an individual direct to every other person isn't worthy in an ideal society.
The theory that asserts that motivation is essentially a decision about how much effort to exert to get what you want is expectancy theory.
<h3>What is motivation?</h3>
It should be noted that motivation simply explains why people behave in a particular way.
In this case, expectancy theory states that asserts that motivation is essentially a decision about how much effort to exert to get what you want.
Learn more about motivation on:
brainly.com/question/11871721
