Answer:
D. Control of Territory
Explanation:
The purpose of the War was to decide who would control the enormous possessions accumulated by the English monarchs since 1154 in French territories, due to the accession to the English throne of Henry II Plantagenet, Count of Anjou. It ended with the English withdrawal of French lands.
The name of this conflict was A) The Yamasee (or Yemassee) War. This war, which took place between 1715 and 1717, was a conflict between English settlers and the Yamasee Indians, who, after being expelled from their homeland in present-day northern Florida and southern Georgia, had settled in the area that would become South Carolina. The relationship between the Native Americans and the white settlers was cordial at first, but it gradually deteriorated, specially when the former were progressively deprived of land and unable to pay off a debt, and the latter enslaved a group of Yamasee women and children in retaliation. Assisted by other tribes, the Native Americans destroyed part of the white settlement and killed hundreds of colonists and heads of livestock, but when the Cherokee Indians surprisingly sided with the white settlers the Yamasee Indians were forcefully pushed back into Florida, where they were almost completely destroyed.
Supply and demand factors
Sentiment and market psychology
Technical factors
This question is incomplete; here is the complete question:
All of the following were activities for Paleolithic nomads EXCEPT:
A. digging up plants
B. making and repairing
C. protecting flocks and herds
D. finding secure places to live
The correct answer to this question is C. protecting flocks and herds
Explanation:
During the Paleolithic, human groups had a nomadic lifestyle, this means they did not settle in one place but moved through different places to find plants to eat and collect or animals to hunt. Moreover, this lifestyle involved finding temporary places to stay and creating tools to facilitate hunting and other tasks.
However, humans of this period did not focus on protecting flocks and herds (option C) because they were only interested in hunting animals and if flocks were not available they just moved to another area. Moreover, this activity only occurred after the neolithic as human groups settled and began raising their own animals, which implied protecting these.
Taking into account the statement above: "Explain in your own words how the thesis of causal determinism would seem at odds with the possibility of a person's doing something of his or her own free will. (This will involve explaining what causal determinism is (how it differs from fatalism) and what free will involves, and why the truth of the one would seem to conflict with the possibility of the other.)"
the causes of the event are sufficient to occur in which no other event would occur.
For example: light a match
For the fatalism, the action is to predetermine with no causal antecedents for the action to occur.
Free will involves the condition that you would do otherwise if you had chosen.
And the issue of where they conflict is that you cannot both be determined and free.
For example: the Bridge Breaking.
Hope this helps.