Answer:
0.2840 or 28.40%
Explanation:
The formula for EAR= (1 + i/n)^n - 1
Where i= stated interest rate
n= number of compounding periods
In this case since the interest he paid is 1 cent, to convert it into percentage, we divide it by the dollar and multiply by 100
Note: 100 cent = 1 dollar
Therefore 4 dollars= 400 cents
To get the Interest rates= 1/400 x 100
= 0.25
n= 365 since we are computing daily
(1 + 0.25/365)^365 - 1
(1 + 0.000685)^365 - 1
(1.000685)^365 - 1
1.2840 - 1
0.2840 or 28.40%.
Answer:
B. Collateral promise.
Explanation:
Collateral promise refers to a promise to pay the debt of another that is ancillary to an original promise. It is an undertaking which renders the promisor a guarantor or surety upon a debt owing by a third person who is primarily liable. It is not made for the benefit of the party making it.
Answer:
$119,300
Explanation:
the bank balance must be adjusted by adding the deposit in transit and the check that was charged against the account by mistake, and you must also subtract outstanding checks:
adjusted bank balance = $148,000 + $17,000 + $2,300 - $48,000 = $119,300
Answer:
c. $84,300.
Explanation:
The computation of the total cost of the land is shown below:
= Purchase cost of land + commission incurred + property taxes + title insurance
= $75,000 + $4,500 + $4,000 + $800
= $84,300
We simply added that costs which are related to the land i.e purchase cost, commission , property taxes ,and title insurance. The $1,000 cost should not be considered.
Answer:
b. Place the company on a restricted list and give only factual information about the company.
Explanation:
There is an ethical problem in the scenario that borders on professional code of conducts in the area of objectivity and independence.
It was stated in the scenario that ''the head of the investment banking department has asked the head of the brokerage unit <u>to change the recommendation from "sell" to "buy."</u>
This is a case of wanting to interfere with the <u>objectivity</u> of the recommendations which should be based on <u>facts not bias</u>.
Secondly, the head of investment banking is trying to interfere with the <u>independence</u> of the head of brokerage unit.
According to the Standards, the head of the brokerage unit would be permitted to place the company on a restricted list and <u>give only factual information</u> about the company.
