Answer:
The money supply should be set at 800
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to calculate the value at which Fed should set the money supply at after fixing the interest rate at 7 percent.
We proceed as follows;
Let the new money supply be M.
To fix the interest rate at 7%, r= 7 and P = 2
(M/P)d = 2,200 - 200r
= 2200 - 200(7)
=2200-1400
= 800
M = 800
Answer:Yield to maturity is 9.59%; After tax cost of debt =7.672%
Explanation:
A) Yield to maturity ={ C + (FV-PV)/t} / {(FV +PV)/2}
Where C – Interest payment = $90
FV – Face value of the security
= $1000
PV – Present value/curent market value = $960
t – years it takes the security to reach maturity= 10 years
imputing the values and calculating,
yield to maturity ={ C + (FV-PV)/t} / {(FV +PV)/2}
= $90 + (1000-960)/10} / 1000 + 960 /2
$90 + 4= $94 /980= 0.0959
therefore Yield to maturity is 9.59%
B) After tax cost of debt = Yield To Maturity x (1 - tax rate)
=9.59% x (1-20%)= 9.59% x (1-0.2 )= 9.59% x 0.8 =
9.59 % x 80%=7.672%
Answer:
c. there is a negative externality.
Explanation:
At the time when one individual actions develops the benefits for others but at the same time they dont pay so it is to be known as positive externality
At the time when one individual action develops loss but the other who received the loss because of the action of the person so for this they didnt get the compensation so it is the negative externality
As we can see that there is three types of values so the correct option is c.
The answer is A. Michelle's meeting with the section managers is one in which she is dispensing information or functioning as a disseminator. Michelle is connecting with others here, but she is not a liaison because she is connecting within the organization, not outside of it. Michelle is neither addressing a problem nor mediating between parties so she is not functioning in the role of disturbance handler or negotiator.Please make my answer the brainliest.
Answer:
According to F.A. Hayek, the fundamental problem facing every society is how to use limited resources in the most optimal way possible.
Explanation:
To Hayek, this problem could not be fully solved by any society, but the best a society could do is to rely on the price system, only possible under a free market, to signal which uses were more optimal than others.
This is also the reason why F.A. Hayek, along with fellow Austrian economists Ludwing Von Mises, believe that socialism could not work: socialism, according to Hayek and Mises, destroyes the price system, and without it, society has no rational way to allocate resources in an optimal way.
