Answer:
Option B is the correct answer to this question.
Explanation:
A concomitant condition must emerge as a fact while both parties involved in the contract will be to execute at the same time. However, no party does have an obligation to act before the other group has produced or signed results. A group essentially needs to offer / tender participation with the present manifest potential to perform efficiently and this causes the other group to act.
Other options are incorrect because they are not related to the given scenario.
1. yes. like the jim crow laws. they discriminated against african americans and made things very unfair. it was completely legal, but not moral at all. it’s very inhuman to treat others like that
2. yes. like helping a holocaust victim escape or hide from the nazi’s. it was illegal but people wanted to do it to help and protect them
Third parties face many obstacles in the United States. In all states, the Democratic and Republican candidates automatically get on the ballot, whereas third-party candidates usually have to get thousands of signatures on petitions just to be listed on the ballot. The state and federal governments, which make rules governing elections, are composed of elected Democratic and Republican officials, who have a strong incentive to protect the existing duopoly. Also, third-party candidates often face financial difficulties because a party must have received at least 5 percent of the vote in the previous election in order to qualify for federal funds.
Answer:
Minh doesn't have to continue paying for the contract.
I think it’s the first one