Answer:
Federal judges are judges who serve in a federal court. The term refers both to the Article III federal judges and to Article I federal judges, who serve as magistrate and bankruptcy judges, and in other Article III tribunals.
Federal judges are nominated by the president of the United States and confirmed by the Senate. The various steps to the process is given below:
- The president nominates an candidate for a judicial seat.
- The candidate fills out a questionnaire which is reviewed by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
- The <em>Senate Judiciary Committee </em>holds a hearing with the candidate, interviewing he or her about things like their judicial philosophy, past rulings or opinions, and ideas about certain areas of Law;
- As part of this process, the committee sends a blue slip to senators from the home state in which the judicial election was received, allowing them to indicate whether or not they approve of the candidate
4. After the hearing, the Senate Judiciary Committee will vote to approve or return the candidate;
- If approved, the candidate is voted on by the full Senate.
- If the Committee votes to return the candidate to the president, the president has the opportunity to re-nominate the individual.
5. The Senate holds a vote on the candidate.
- If the Senate confirms the nomination, the nominee receives a commission to serve a lifelong position as a Federal Judge.
- If the Senate does not confirm the nomination, that candidate does not become a judge.
Cheers!
The district attorney would be correct in charging Dr. Nick with a criminally negligent homicide.
<h3>What is a
negligent homicide?</h3>
This refers to the criminal charge brought against a person who, through criminal negligence that allows another person to die.
When Dr Nicks. nicks an artery because his intoxicated condition is creating double vision and cause Derrick to suffers severe blood loss, falls into a coma and dies eight months later, he has committed a negligent homicide.
Hence, the district attorney would be correct in charging Dr. Nick with a criminally negligent homicide.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about negligent homicide
brainly.com/question/6228473
#SPJ1
Answer:
Una crítica epistemológica a la idea neopositivista de ‘racionalidad científica' a partir de un análisis del racismo implícito en los conceptos científicos ortodoxos sobre la diversidad biológica humana durante el periodo de aceptación de las tesis darwinistas sobre el origen evolutivo de nuestra especie.
Explanation:
Answer:
Inheritance laws
Explanation:
Inheritance Laws are those resolutions and guidelines influencing who is qualified for getting what from the state of a dead family member. A few family members, for example, life partners and kids, reserve a privilege to guarantee a legacy and can even do as such in spite of the express terms of a will.