1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Katyanochek1 [597]
4 years ago
13

Which best explains the Full Faith and Credit clause within Article IV?

History
1 answer:
Bess [88]4 years ago
5 0
<h2>  Answer:</h2>

One of the many points of discussion between Federalists, who supported a powerful federal government, and Anti-Federalists, who desired the power to continue with state and local governments. It was the flaw in the constitution of a bill of rights that it did not give the powers to the government.

Federalists opposed that the Constitution, that it does not require a bill of claims because the people and the states retained any powers not assigned to the federal administration. Anti-Federalists believed that a bill of rights was essential to safeguard personal freedom.


You might be interested in
What forces drive a dictator?
Mrrafil [7]
A dictator<span> was a magistrate of the Roman Republic, entrusted with the full authority of the state .Technically, a senatus consultum was advisory, and did not have the </span>force<span> of law, but in practice it's rite involving the </span>driving<span> of a nail into the wall of the Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus, as a protection against pestilence. Hope this helps :)</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is NOT true? Early writing:
Digiron [165]

Answer:

a. was developed to keep record.

Explanation:

It is not true that early writing was developed to keep record because in ancient times, <u>the writing was used as a way to express different things and it was indeed syllabic and it spread from Mesopotamia to Egypt</u> but in its early days, the people used a stick to write on the walls.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
As a result of the Treaty of Paris (1763) who gained control of Canada and Florida?
Vsevolod [243]
Your answer is D: Great Britain 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Texas leaders and Comanches meet in early 1840?what happened as a result of this meeting
Soloha48 [4]
A peace policy that utilized trade and gifts to promote friendship and authorized military force only to punish specific acts of aggression was inaugurated and remained in effect, with varying degrees of success, for the remainder of Spanish rule in Texas. The first success of the new Spanish policy came <span>in 1762, when Fray José Calahorra y Saenz negotiated a treaty with the Comanches, who agreed not to make war on missionized Apaches. Continued Apache aggression made it impossible for the Comanches to keep their promise, and ultimately led Spanish officials to advocate a Spanish-Comanche alliance aimed at exterminating the Apaches. That policy was officially implemented in 1772, and with the help of Athanase de Mézières, a French trader serving as Spanish diplomat, a second treaty was signed with the Comanches. The Comanche chief Povea signed the treaty in 1772 at San Antonio, thereby committing his band to peace with the Spaniards. Other bands, however, continued to raid Spanish settlements. Comanche attacks escalated in the early 1780s, and Spanish officials feared the province of Texas would be lost. To avoid that possibility, the governor of Texas, Domingo Cabello y Robles, was instructed to negotiate peace with the warring Comanches. He dispatched Pedro Vial and Francisco Xavier de Chaves to Comanchería with gifts and proposals for peace. The mission was successful, and the emissaries returned to San Antonio with three principal Comanche chiefs who were authorized by their people to make peace with the Spanish. The result was the Spanish-Comanche Treaty of 1785, a document that Comanches honored, with only minor violations, until the end of the century. As Spanish power waned in the early years of the nineteenth century, officials were unable to supply promised gifts and trade goods, and Comanche aggression once again became commonplace. Comanches raided Spanish settlements for horses to trade to Anglo-American traders entering Texas from the United States. Those Americans furnished the Comanches with trade goods, including arms and ammunition, and provided a thriving market for Comanche horses.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
The Virginia Company wanted to find a route to the Pacific Ocean in order to trade with
Alja [10]
The answer is China.
4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How much rainfall does the coastal Choco region of columbia recieve a year?
    13·2 answers
  • in which year was elie weisel deported? a. 1928 b. 1944 c. 1956 d. 1962 please select the best answer from the choices provided
    7·2 answers
  • Consider social, political, and economic equality. In what ways did Radical Reconstruction address and secure these forms of equ
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following items is not one of the five purposes of government?
    11·2 answers
  • What does the worfMzgfzkg ztkslgstksyduhdlhyfufufj cfufufjrr. huh
    15·1 answer
  • True or false: Imperialism was one of the many causes of World War
    6·1 answer
  • Do you believe that is a draft is infringing on someone's natural rights?<br> Why
    7·1 answer
  • What's the definition of Unicameral and Bicameral
    11·1 answer
  • Do the ratios <br> 2<br> 1<br> and <br> 16<br> 10<br> form a proportion? YES OR NO?
    6·1 answer
  • Which example describes a primary source?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!