Separate but Equal/Segregation was overturned, since segregation in public schools was deemed unconstitutional.
Lasted 27 years but if your rounding 30 years
Answer:
OD
Explanation:
He didn't form a new fair tax system instead the other accomplishments where his major accomplishments
The best answer would be D.
The debate over whether a bill of rights should be added to the Constitution or not, started from some delegates' beliefs that guarantees of certain basic rights were missing from the ratified Constitution. They wanted some amendments to be included, in order to secure those liberties to the citizens.
The Federalists (those who supported the ratification of the Constitution) argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal gonvernmnet. Alexander Hamilton, for example, argued that because the proposed federal government would possess only specifically assigned limited powers, ir could not threaten the fundamental liberties of the people. Anti-Federalists, however, held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty and the power of the states.
Unless there are specific choices I can only offer you a list of potential answers.
Sherman Act (1890), Federal Trade Commission Act (1914), and the Clayton Act (1914).
The Sherman Act outlawed all forms of monopolization and any attempts to do so. It also set strict penalties for any and all violations of this law.
The Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 created the Federal Trade Commission which oversaw national business practices.
The Clayton Act addresses more specific points but especially focuses on preventing monopolies through regulation of mergers and acquisitions. It also goes on to prevent discriminatory pricing and dealings.
Further reading can be found on:
https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/antitrust-laws