Answer:
freedom of the press.
Explanation:
If that is what you meant
Freedom of the press:Freedom of the press or freedom of the media is the principle that communication and expression through various media, including printed and electronic media, especially published materials, should be considered a right to be exercised freely. Such freedom implies the absence of interference from an overreaching state; its preservation may be sought through constitution or other legal protection and security.
Without respect to governmental information, any government may distinguish which materials are public or protected from disclosure to the public. State materials are protected due to either one of two reasons: the classification of information as sensitive, classified or secret, or the relevance of the information to protecting the national interest. Many governments are also subject to "sunshine laws" or freedom of information legislation that are used to define the ambit of national interest and enable citizens to request access to government-held information.
The United Nations' 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference, and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media regardless of frontiers".[1]
This philosophy is usually accompanied by legislation ensuring various degrees of the freedom of the scientific research (known as the scientific freedom), the publishing, and the press. The depth to which these laws are entrenched in a country's legal system can go as far down as its constitution. The concept of freedom of speech is often covered by the same laws as freedom of the press, thereby giving equal treatment to spoken and published expression. Sweden was the first country in the world to adopt freedom of the press into its constitution with the Freedom of the Press Act of 1766.
Http://iblog.dearbornschools.org/forstej/wp-content/uploads/sites/1645/2016/10/americanimperialismgraphicorganizer__1_.pdf
That the link but if you can find it just go to goggle and type in mrs sandoval erhs american imperialism and click the first thing that pops up
Even though Congress cut funding for military aid to the contra rebels, the Reagan administration continued to fund them through other means. One of the ways they did this was by selling weapons to Iran. This was done through an intermediary (aka a middle man) because this was illegal, as Congress passed an embargo and declared Iran a sponsor of terrorism as of 1979. When it was discovered that the Reagan administration was continuing to support the contra rebels by breaking the law, it negatively impacted America's perception of his administration.
<span />
It means "Give me liberty or give me death"
Correct answer:
(A) can authorize similar action in the future.
The legal term "precedent" refers to a court decision that establishes a principle or rule. The principle established by the court's decision is used in other cases after that when courts encounter other cases that pertain to similar issues or circumstances. Decisions of a higher court are binding as precedent on any lower courts in the system, so a decision made by a state court would be binding on any county or municipal courts within that state.