Answer: something the polar opposite of a pillow.
Explanation:
Let's say, the world hot, hot is opposite of cold.
The domain .net is for network support centers, internet service providers, and other network-related organizations.
<h3><u>
What is internet service provider?</u></h3>
- An entity that offers services for accessing, utilizing, or participating in the Internet is known as an Internet service provider (ISP).
- ISPs can be set up in a number of ways, including commercial, community-owned, non-profit, or in another manner that is privately held.
- Internet access, Internet transit, domain name registration, web hosting, Usenet service, and colocation are among the common internet services offered by ISPs.
- An ISP often acts as the gateway or access point that gives a user access to all of the resources on the Internet. An eyeball network is another name for such a network.
As a network between participating university departments and government research facilities, the Internet (formerly known as ARPAnet) was created. Other businesses and organizations joined either directly through connections to the backbone or through agreements with other linked businesses, occasionally utilizing dialup technologies like UUCP.
Know more about internet service provider with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/18000293
#SPJ4
<h3 />
Answer:
Explanation:
25x6 is the answer to this question
Answer:
they can veto bills and can also make treaties with the approval of the senate ...hope it helps:)
Explanation:
Answer:
No impact.
Explanation:
In some countries, states do not have the autonomy to formulate their own laws. The US is not one of those. In the state territory, although there are laws that apply throughout the country, each state can formulate its own laws and these must be followed within the limits of the state and punishable by those who disobey. The law of each state must be judged in its home state and cannot be imposed on another state that does not accept that law as the rule to be followed. Thus, in relation to the above question, we can conclude that if state law in the neighboring state requires that interrogation be recorded on video, that law has no impact on state interrogation that does not require such recording.
