I am not certian on the context of this question. This feels like the sort of question that needs the assistance of vocab notes you may have been provided to accurately answer.
That said, some possible answers are...
- Broad Generalization
- Biased Observation
- Explicit Prejudice
Answer:
Hi, you haven't provided the options to the question, so I will just give the answer in my own words and you can check with the options.
Answer is NEGLIGENCE.
Explanation:
A duty of care is a legal responsibility of a person or organization to avoid any behaviours or omissions that could reasonably be foreseen to cause harm to others. For example, a sports administrator, sporting organizations, administrators and facility managers usually have a duty of care to participants to take reasonable care to ensure that safe playing surfaces are provided.
Duty of care is the first element that must be established to proceed with an action in negligence.
Negligence is defined as a failure to exercise the care that a reasonable prudent person would have done in the same circumstances.
Therefore, according to the question, the neglect or failure to fulfill in a just and proper manner the duties of care of a recreation or sports service provider is known as NEGLIGENCE.
<span>No, because the right to free speech allows for a reasonable regulation of time, place, and manner so long as the regulation is content neutral.
The right of free speech that Citizens in United States have extended until those citizens cause a certain amount of harm toward other citizens. If this happens, both other citizens and the Defense Department have the right to stop the speech..
</span>
That the price for gasoline will go down as well
