1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jarptica [38.1K]
3 years ago
6

What is a possible drawback to direct democracy? How might it be resolved?

Social Studies
1 answer:
harina [27]3 years ago
7 0
Direct democracy would be extremely costly because people would have to vote on every single thing and this would cost time and money to ensure everyone has voted. It couldn't be resolved in early times, but maybe with the age of technology you could surpass that by having everyone vote online or something similar.

You might be interested in
A higher standard of living for the middle class was increasingly identified with
Sophie [7]

Answer:

A higher standard of living for the middle class was increasingly identified with the ability to purchase goods and products that were produced on a mass scale.

Explanation: After the Industrial Revolution, products were able to be both produced AND purchased on a mass scale by society.

The high quantity of a variety of quality goods readily available to citizens for purchase, with less labor from humans required due to the use of machinery to lighten the process, greatly increased the standard of living.

4 0
2 years ago
How does the bill of writes protect citizens against <br> Poverty
dalvyx [7]

Answer:

it provides aid for the poor from foundations such as adoption and food shelters

Explanation:

4 0
1 year ago
Why is the sky orange and red at sunrise and sunset?
Len [333]

Answer:

the answer is b

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help it will be brainlist
uranmaximum [27]

Answer:

Nitrogen fixation by bacteria

hope it help

please mark as brainliest

3 0
2 years ago
What is the most likely reason the republicsame of Yugoslavia held together until the fall of communism
erik [133]
This is a little open for interpretation, but I would generally say that the best answer is that Josip Broz Tito was a very powerful leader, who kept the republics and the different groups together.

For example, we can see this from the fact that the first conflict happened in 1981: one year after his death ( a protest of Kosovans who demanded autonomy).
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 1. Interpret: Why did the Iroquois choose to side with the British? I​
    9·1 answer
  • What is the historical reason for Americans choosing a bicameral system?
    9·1 answer
  • What realization ultimately led to changes in water management practices in florida
    14·1 answer
  • A government that is not constrained by legal limits and also seeks to eliminate any challenges to its authority is known as a(n
    15·1 answer
  • Write a short speech on kindness​
    7·2 answers
  • What is the relationship between politically affiliated and independent PACs with regard to how they are regulated and how much
    10·1 answer
  • Before World War II
    7·1 answer
  • What economy was new England central around
    10·1 answer
  • Who was the presadent in 1964
    13·2 answers
  • how long do the detectives have to wait for abraham to be picked up? half an hour fifteen minutes one hour two hours
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!