Answer:
Assuming your referring to the Christian "Great Chain of Being" then no.
Explanation:
(I will try to be as unbiased as possible)
Just to clarify for anyone who is uniformed on what exactly the Great Chain of Being is... it is a hierarchy chart which first surfaced in Medieval Europe which goes in order as... God, Angelic Beings, Humanity, Animals, Plants, Minerals.
In the Bible it is stated numerous times (I can find the specific page and such if needed) that "great beasts" roamed the earth... now there is no historical or scientific evidence this was referring directly to Dinosaurs but there is evidence that mass extinction events have occurred all throughout history and some are event mentioned in the bible itself (The Great Flood) It is thought that about 75% of all animal life on earth was wiped out (Also most believe that some form of Humanity was alive during the supposed asteroid strike) which means that if you are arguing that a mass extinction event would mean that Great Chain of Being or basically the existence of God then you would be wrong. (Again being unbiased here, there is also no evidence that there is a "God" or Gods)
I hope this could help, my apologies if it didn't. If you need any more elaboration I will gladly try my best to help out down in the comments
The text in this passage that mostly shows a lack of concern was the refuse dump that was left in the neighborhood
According to the passage there were inadequacies in the method through which refuse was collected.
In this particular area, it was a big problem. The people that lived in the area were made to stay in such pitiable and foul environment.
The area was so bad that there was a fear of sickness and death from this issue. But although the problem was constantly reported to the politicians, nothing was done about it.
Read more on brainly.com/question/13793268?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
McCulloch vs Maryland was a landmark case of the United States.
Explanation:
The case of McCulloch vs Maryland was one of the most interesting and a land marking case in the United States of America. This case change the federal power of the government. The McCulloch vs Maryland case dated back to 1819.
The decision of this case given by the US Supreme Court limited the legislative powers of the US Congress and it scoped its powers to the State Legislature.
The Supreme Court said that a National Bank would be established by the United States' Congress and that the state of Maryland would not have the power to the tax branches of the US federal government.
Broadly it interpreted the power of the Congress and increased the national powers.
An Appellate Court is not (usually) the Court of original jurisdiction. So, in many cases you would start at a Federal Trial Court (District Court) and would have a normal trial. If you lost, you could appeal to the Appellate Court, who would review the record (only) from the Trial Court for clear error, bias, etc. A new trial does not occur at the Appellate Level, unless it is a court of original jurisdiction.
3 is the answer to the question
