1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
svp [43]
3 years ago
11

What tense is the underlined verb in the sentence? The architect designed a daring structure. A. present B. past perfect C. pres

ent perfect D. past
History
1 answer:
diamong [38]3 years ago
4 0

The conjugation of the verb "design" to "designed", without any auxiliary verb such as "have" or "do", shows the use of the 'simple past" tense (also known as preterite), whose principal function is to place a completed action or situation in a moment before "now".

What tense is the underlined verb in the sentence? The architect designed a daring structure.

D. Past


You might be interested in
Renaissance painters broke with medieval tradition. According to your text, which element was NOT widely used by Renaissance pai
KonstantinChe [14]
I think the answer is d
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to the Roman law, why is slavery legal
vladimir2022 [97]

Answer:

The legal state of slaves was based on the fact that the slave was not a subject but an object of law

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is true of life in the New England colonies?
lozanna [386]
The best option from the list would be that "<span>B. Those who aspired to the social elite had to be members of a Congregational church", since, depending slightly on the exact time in question, the Church was a way to social prosperity. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
President Wilson saw the US involvement in WW1 as an opportunity to?
zaharov [31]
Wilson tried to keep the United States neutral during World War I but ultimately called on Congress to declare war on Germany in 1917. After the war, he helped negotiate a peace treaty that included a plan for the League of Nations. Although the Senate rejected U.S. membership in the League, Wilson received the Nobel Prize for his peacemaking efforts.




This may help
6 0
3 years ago
Understanding the Case
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • This image was published in the late 1960s during the Civil Rights Movement. Which of the following reflects true statements abo
    6·1 answer
  • Anyone that can help me?
    8·2 answers
  • How did the war powers act of 1941 affect Asian Americans? In your own opinion, how should civil rights and national security be
    13·1 answer
  • What effect did the oil crisis have on U.S. energy policy?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following actions would the War Production Board most likely make?
    13·2 answers
  • What is the advantage of blending various traditions within a culture?
    7·1 answer
  • As Othello confronts Iago, what does he mean when he says “i look down towards his feet, but that is a fable”
    6·1 answer
  • The Supreme Court ruling of Brown v. Board of Education II in 1955 directed schools to desegregate...
    12·2 answers
  • Read the sentence from Heart of a Samurai.
    5·2 answers
  • In 35 words or fewer, explain why it might be hard to determine the<br> exact cause of an event.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!