Answer:
O A. It is highly personal and makes assumptions about other people's feelings.
Explanation:
The <u>credibility of any historical source depends on the nature of the source</u>. If it is an <u>unbiased and have a valid proof of the claim/ argument</u> made, then we can say that the source is credible.
On reading the given passage, we can safely assume that it is not a credible source. One, because it <u>contains a highly personal opinion</u> of the Haitian Revolution. And two, it <u>makes assumptions about the feelings of others</u>, especially the slaves<em> "who worked on [his/her] plantation"</em>. The speaker felt that the slaves in his plantation <em>"were much happier before the plantation [.. and would] like things to go back to the way they were"</em>. This <u>personal and assumptive opinion makes it easy for historians to question the source's credibility.
</u>
Thus, the correct answer is option A.
Answer:
Explanation:
Once each chamber has approved the bill, the legislation is sent to the President. The President then makes the decision of whether to sign the bill into law or not. If the President signs the bill, it becomes a law. If the President refuses to sign it, the bill does not become a law.
Answer:
It would be Prophet Muhammad’s
Its B) <span>The institution of a single language for government
</span>
I think its The colonies were settled by people following a single religion.and <span>Europeans from many countries settled in the colonies.</span>
