Based on the number of guidelines for <em>communicating with children about divorce</em> by Ellen Galinsky and Judy David, the one which is NOT a part of the guidelines is to:
- Explain that things will be better soon
According to the given question, we are asked to state the statement which is NOT a part of the guidelines by<em> Ellen and Judy David</em> about telling children about divorce.
As a result of this, we can see that based on the guidelines which were given by Ellen Galinsky and Judy David about <em>communicating with children about divorce</em>, it is important to let them know what is going on, but <em>not to explain that things will be better soon</em>, as this was NOT one of the guidelines.
Read more about divorce here:
brainly.com/question/7138705
Because of the land and open space. it was a good place for growing crops because of the rich soil
Answer:
People in America integrate the European Mammals to their Economic activities.
Explanation:
Cattles and Horses are among the large Mammals that introduced by the European in American region, and they change the way people in America conduct their daily activities.
For example, Farmers relied by only using tools to fertilize their land. After Cattles exist, they integrate their farming tools so it can be pulled by these cattle's and make the while process a lot faster.
We can also see this in the distribution process. Without horses, the American people cannot pulled off carriage bring their goods and sell it to a far location.
The correct answer is C) because they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view.
<em>In the majority opinion, Fortas suggested that the reason the school authorities suspended the students was that they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view. </em>
We are referring to the case Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District that was decided on February 24, 1969.
In 1965, five students decided to wear black armbands in protest of the Vietnam War and they were suspended by the school for doing that. In the majority opinion, Judge Abe Fortas suggested that the reason the school authorities suspended the students was that they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view. At the end of the case, the Court decided that the use of armbands as a protest was not a motive to cause any disruption and that the protest was protected by freedom of speech.
