1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Troyanec [42]
3 years ago
9

Which of the following led to World War II?

History
2 answers:
sweet-ann [11.9K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The treaty ending World War I caused great resentment in Germany.

Explanation:

  • The Germans disliked the Treaty of Versailles because they ought not been permitted to take a role in the International meetings.
  • The Germans resented and disliked the Treaty of Versailles for Germany, because it was the reason for all the rigid conditions of the Treaty, and because they assumed Russia was to blame for beginning the war.

notsponge [240]3 years ago
3 0
The treaty to World War 1 caused great resentment in Germany
You might be interested in
Explain the rational as to why people created government
nata0808 [166]

Answer:

Explanation:

Problem Solving

Identifying Basic Rights

Think of a right you believe all people should have. For example, you probably agree that everyone in the United States has the right to be protected from robbers and burglars. The belief that everyone should have this protection is shared by most people in the United States. We hear about it on television, in the newspaper, and in discussions.

Individually or in small groups, explain how you think rights like the one you have identified can be protected.

Defining "Natural Rights"

Most people in the American colonies believed that everyone had a right to life, liberty, and property. These rights were called natural rights. (Sometimes these are now called basic rights or fundamental rights.) The idea of natural rights means that all persons have these rights just because they are human beings. Everyone is born with these rights and they should not be taken away without a person's agreement.

Many of the Founders believed people receive these rights from God. Others believed that people have them just because it is natural for people to have them.

John Locke was a famous English philosopher. He lived from 1632 to 1704. He had written a book called Two Treatises of Civil Government (1690). In that book he wrote about natural rights. He said that the main purpose of government should be to protect the people's natural rights. He also said that kings should not have absolute power, that is, power without limits. They should not be able to deprive people of their natural rights.

Many Americans had read Locke's book, and they agreed with what it said about government. Those who had not actually read Locke's book knew his ideas from newspapers, political pamphlets, church sermons, and discussions.

Protecting Natural Rights

Although people agreed on certain natural rights, they worried about how those rights could be protected. Locke and others thought about what life would be like in a situation where there was no government and no laws. They called this situation a state of nature. They were afraid that in a state of nature their rights would be taken away.

Think what your classroom might be like if there were no rules.

Problem Solving

It's your turn to think like a philosopher

Imagine what life might be like in a state of nature. Think what your classroom might be like if there were no rules. Think what might happen if the teacher didn't have the right to tell anyone what to do.

Work together in groups of about five to answer the following questions about such a situation. Then choose a person to explain your answers to the rest of the class. Then compare your answers with John Locke's which follow.

What might be the advantages and disadvantages of living in a state of nature?

What might happen to people's rights?

What might life be like for everyone?

Compare Your List with John Locke's

You may have seen the same disadvantages in a state of nature that John Locke saw. Locke believed:

The stronger and smarter people might try to take away other people's lives, liberty, or property.

Weaker people might band together and take away the rights of the stronger and smarter people.

People would be unprotected and insecure.

The Social Compact

John Locke and other philosophers developed a solution to the problems that exist in a place without government. In a state of nature, people might feel free to do anything they want to do. However, their rights would not be protected and they would feel insecure.

Locke argued that people should agree with one another to give up some of their freedom in exchange for protection and security. They should consent to follow some laws in exchange for the protection that these laws would give them. This agreement is called a social compact or social contract. A social compact is an agreement people make among themselves to create a government to rule them and protect their natural rights. In this agreement the people consent to obey the laws created by that government.

In a later lesson, you will study the Declaration of Independence. You will see how the Founders included all of the ideas you have studied in this lesson in the Declaration.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Briefly explain one development or situation in the british or american colonies between 1607 and 1692 that demonstrates that th
ICE Princess25 [194]

Between 1607 and 1692, the rise in use of slaves as a form of labor shows that there was no socio economic mobility in the American colonies. Slavery developed gradually over this period but become extremely prevelant after Bacon's Rebellion (1676). This system of slavery ensured that enslaved Africans had no legal rights, were considered property, and could not earn wages. No matter how hard these individuals worked, they were still considered property and earned no money for their production. This is a perfect example of the lack of socio economic mobility in the colonies during the 17th century.

3 0
3 years ago
True or false? Supreme Court Justices are required to leave the court, or
IRINA_888 [86]

Answer: No

Explanation:

All Court and Judicial Postistions are lifetime

7 0
2 years ago
Why did the Articles of Confederation have to be replaced by the Constitution?
denis23 [38]
The articles created a very weak government, giving the states most of the power. So, go with B.
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to the tables you read, China was the
Kitty [74]
China is growing exponentially as a provider of steel and other products, and it makes complete sense since the nations economy is rising at an incredible pace. The United States traditionally was a huge supplier, but over the past 12 years China has been building structures at an unprecedented rate, and steel being the huge component of large skyscrapers this is one of the biggest reasons for its growth over the decade
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What three factors were part of european imperialism
    13·1 answer
  • For which projects would a government leader most likely use a cost-benefit analysis? Check all that apply.
    15·2 answers
  • What are three inventions besides the telephone by alexander graham bell?
    12·2 answers
  • Which agency was not created during roosevelt's new deal?
    9·2 answers
  • How has the history of voting in America impacted us today in 2020?
    5·1 answer
  • What is the main goal of financial planning?
    8·2 answers
  • What was the relationship between the Shona people and the groups along the Swahili Coast?
    11·2 answers
  • Why did it take so long for the united states to enter WW1?
    12·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELPP
    9·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu. in 1994, a civil war broke out between the hutu and tutsi tribes in . in the
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!