Answer: Bunker Hill May 17, 1755, Battle of Long Island August 27, 1776, Battle of Trenton 26.12.1776, Battle of Saratoga autumn 1777.
Explanation:
The attack on Bunker Hill was carried out by members of British troops led by William Howe. He led an army of about 2,500 soldiers, and on the other hand, there were about 1,500 Americans in defense. The battle took place on the Bunker above Hill in Charlestown near Boston. The attack for the British was disastrous because over 1000 soldiers lost their lives. On the other hand, about 400 Americans were killed. The battle also represented a moral victory for the Americans.
The Battle of Long Island took place in what is now Brooklyn, New York. The Barritans sought to conquer territories to control the port. The British were led by William Howe and defeated the American defense in several attacks with the army. Howe had over 30,000 troops. With quality military maneuvers, Howe brought the British army behind the back and the side of the Americans, which led to total disintegration among American troops.
The army of General George Washington defeated the garrison of Hessian mercenaries on December 26, 1776, and January 3, 1777, on two occasions. Victories are considered one of the key details of the war for independence. The battles gave the Americans a huge psychological advantage. The victory established control over New Jersey and led to the unification of American troops. The Battle of Saratoga brought an advantage in the war in favor of the Americans and decided the war's winner for independence. British General John Burgoyne led a large army. The U.S. military surrounded his troops. A British general with two military maneuvers tried unsuccessfully to break out of the ring. In a hopeless situation, he withdrew with the troops in Saratoga and soon had to surrender.
Which best describes the impact of the declaration of the rights of man and of the citizen?
Answer
it put into practice ideals of the enlightenment
Explanation
The rights of man and of the citizens which were put into practice in this this declaration includes that men should remain free and be entitled to equal rights The rights were liberty,property safety and to be set free from oppression.
Yes I think that each side has good things to say about the other side. This is because I think that many people's political viewpoints don't always perfectly align to one party or the other. In reality, life is much more complicated than picking one side. Sure some people might agree with policies from the Democrat's side, but they might see other Republican views to be valid as well. I like to think of it as a buffet of ideas, where people tend to pick and choose which talking points they magnetically snap to. We could have for example a socially liberal person but who supports conservative financial measures; or we could have someone who has very religious conservative morals, but supports liberal monetary policies.
In other words, it's unrealistic to assume people will be purely one party. Those who seem that way tend to be stuck in a bubble where it's like a feedback loop of talking points fed to them. Fox News is one example of this on the conservative side, while MSNBC is an example of this on the liberal side. Those stuck in this bubble would likely not have much nice things to say about the other side, if they have anything nice to say at all. However, I think to some (if not many) people, politics has become very toxic that they simply turn the tv off entirely. By "turn off", I mean literally turn it off or change the channel to something else. These people I'd consider somewhere in the middle in a moderate range. Furthermore, these moderates are likely to have some nice things to say about both sides, but they might have their complaints about both sides as well.
In short, if you pick someone from either extreme, then it's likely they'll have nothing nice to say about the other side. If you pick someone from the middle, then they might have nice things to say about both sides. It all depends who you ask. Also, it depends on how politically active they are.
Olayinka Herbert Samuel Heelas Badmus Macaulay (14 November 1864 – 7 May 1946) was a Nigerian nationalist, politician, surveyor, engineer, architect, journalist, and musician and is considered by many Nigerians as the founder of Nigerian nationalism.
