Answer:
Explanation:
Studies of faculty adoption of instructional innovations and surveys of instructional practices in science and engineering have identified several factors that instructors often perceive as obstacles to using more research-based practices.
- Time involved in learning about new strategies and redesigning courses
- Concerns about ensuring that students are taught important content
- Concerns about students’ reactions to an unfamiliar teaching method and the impact on student course evaluations
- Concerns that a different strategy will not work as well, especially if it impacts tenure
-
-
- Departmental norms about teaching methods and other expectations
- Class size and classroom facilities
- Course scheduling issues
Although some of these factors are more myth than reality, several can present genuine challenges. Henderson, Dancy, and Niewiadomska-Bugaj (2012) suggest that about one-third of the faculty who try at least one research-based strategy abandon their reform efforts, often when they are confronted with implementation challenges, such as student complaints, concerns about losing important content, or weaker than expected student outcomes. In addition, faculty members frequently modify a research-based strategy to suit their needs—a reasonable reaction, but one that can compromise effectiveness if the modifications omit elements that are critical to the strategy’s success.
I hope this helps !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer:
B. Mike joined the Army, and he became more disciplined during the training.
Explanation:
Option B is the correct way to rewrite the run-on sentence because the two main independent clauses "Mike joined the Army" and "he became more disciplined during training" are joined by a connecting word "and" and a punctuation mark(comma). Both clauses are related thoughts. In other options the clauses are not joined correctly.
Could you provide the excerpt?
Answer:
The one way mirror is a mirror for one and a window for the other side.
Explanation:
In <em>Through the looking glass</em> by the Washington Post, the author uses the one way mirror to describe the peculiar relation between the US and Canada.
For most Americans, i.e. United States citizens, Canada is an empty screen, for we either don´t know much of it or we are not interested. Or a mixture of both. Therefore the Americans are on the mirror side. We look at ourselves and can only imagine what is behind the mirror.
For the Canadians the mirror is a window that clearly shows how much the other side has influenced (economically, culturally) them. Of course the worldpower factor is decisive in the one way mirror comparison: The US, as the worldpower, cannot be bothered by taking neighbouring countries all too serious; Canada, on the other side, is submitted to play the small little brother that follows suit with everything big brother does.
Answer:
Most importantly in considering the business case for environmental sustainability is the point that it doesn't negatively impact on a business' ability to generate a profit. In fact, in the long term it is considered to actually improve profitability through the reduction of expenses and increased competitiveness
