Answer:
Its divergent
Step-by-step explanation:
<em><u>HOPE</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>YOU</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>LIKED</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>IT</u></em>
Answer:
x<_2
Step-by-step explanation:
first off solve this like a regular equation the >_ dosent matter till later
so basically first multiply - by 13 and -x so you get -13 and x (multiplying two negatives = a positive)
so its 5x-13+x>_9x-7
add 5x and x to get 6x-13 on one side
then you get 6x-13>_9x-7 then subtract -9x from both sides
so its now -3x-13>_-7 add 13 so you get -3x>_6
then divide both sides by -3 (when you divide an equation with a >< or <_ >_ by a negative number that sign switches) so it will now be x<_2
that your final answer hope this helps :)
Answer:
d. $125, $135, $150, $130
Step-by-step explanation:
$125, $135, $150, $130
Range of the above set of numbers:
$150 - $125 = $25
Mean of numbers:
$125 + $135 + $150 + $130 = $540
540 ÷ 4 = $135
Answer:
The volume of sphere is
.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have,
Radius of a sphere is 18 units.
It is required to find the volume of sphere.
The formula of the volume of sphere in terms of radius is given by :

Plugging all values in above formula

So, the volume of sphere is
.
Example of use of terms:
Statement: If it is far, we take a bus.
Inverse: If it is not far, we do not take a bus.
Converse: If we take a bus, it is far.
Contrapositive: If we do not take a bus, it is not far.
We also know that
1. The inverse of the inverse is the statement itself, and similarly for converse and contrapositive.
2. Only the contrapositive is logically equivalent to the original statement.
This means that the converse and inverse are logically different from the original statement.
Now back to the given statement.
To find the original statement, we find the contrapositive of the contrapositive.
We then find the converse from the original statement, as in the example above.
Original statement
(note that in English, if it is not worth X dollars, means if it is not worth AT LEAST X dollars")
contrapositive of
<span>
"If an item is not worth five dimes, then it is not worth two quarters.”
is the negation of the converse, which become
"If an item is worth two quarters, then it is worth (at least) five dimes."
The converse of the previous statement is therefore
"If an item is worth (at least) five dimes then it is worth two quarters"
In this particular case, we can also take advantage of the fact that the contrapositive is the negation of the converse. So all we have to do is the provide the negation of each component of the contrapositive to get the converse:
"If an item is worth (at least) five dimes, then it is worth two quarters".
as before.
Note that the converse does NOT logically mean the same as the original statement.
</span>