1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
goldenfox [79]
3 years ago
7

What do you think happened to Mrs. Drover at the end? Explain, using

English
1 answer:
BabaBlast [244]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

This is an opinion, it is what <u>you</u> think might happen and then you just use lines from the story to explain why you think that. It will make the reader understand your thought process to get to the point of figuring out why you think this would happen next.

Explanation:

...

You might be interested in
Why does Denethor send Faramir into battle
DochEvi [55]
I don't know tbh man
7 0
3 years ago
HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND 100pts
Sliva [168]

World War I, the war that was originally expected to be “over by Christmas,” dragged on for four years with a grim brutality brought on by the dawn of trench warfare and advanced weapons, including chemical weapons. The horrors of that conflict altered the world for decades – and writers reflected that shifted outlook in their work. As Virginia Woolf would later write, “Then suddenly, like a chasm in a smooth road, the war came.”

Early works were romantic sonnets of war and death.

Among the first to document the “chasm” of the war were soldiers themselves. At first, idealism persisted as leaders glorified young soldiers marching off for the good of the country.

English poet Rupert Brooke, after enlisting in Britain’s Royal Navy, wrote a series of patriotic sonnets, including “The Soldier,” which read:

If I should die, think only this of me:

That there’s some corner of a foreign field

That is for ever England.

Brooke, after being deployed in the Allied invasion of Gallipoli, would die of blood poisoning in 1915.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which type of narrator has full knowledge of only one character, rather than all the characters
natulia [17]

Answer:

It is a "limited Third-Person" type of narrator who has full knowledge of only one character, rather than all the characters, since they have no way of seeing other events outside of their own.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What is the simple predicate of "gave me his old croquet set"
AlekseyPX
The simple predicate is gave.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who is waverly’s final opponent? How do you know?
Phoenix [80]
Her mother is her final opponent because her mother had so much more power over her and she wanted to break free. Also because she imagined her mother to be her final.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which sentence best summarizes the central idea of chapter 5 of The Prince?
    9·2 answers
  • Which argument below is free of errors in logic?
    5·1 answer
  • How did Thoreau’s general opinion of government relate to his imprisonment, as described in "Civil Disobedience"?
    10·2 answers
  • An effective way to organize note cards is A. alphabetically. B. a numbering system. C. by length of notes. D. by source.
    12·2 answers
  • Which word in the sentence is a direct object? That computer sent the whole network a message.
    6·2 answers
  • How did you feel toward General Jackson as you read the remaining lines about him (You may refer back to lines 37-42.)?
    13·1 answer
  • Find 5 laws that you think is outrageous in Florida . Create an argumentative response on whether or not you think this should b
    9·2 answers
  • What Does The Three Dots Mean? (...)
    13·1 answer
  • What’s is the correct answer for this?
    5·1 answer
  • Olga and Beth went sledding, and they had a great time doing it.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!