1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
posledela
3 years ago
14

Sanders Corporation issued $ 470,000 of 9​%, ​10-year bonds payable at a price of 91. The market interest rate at the date of is

suance was 10​%, and the bonds pay interest semiannually. The journal entry to record the first semiannual interest payment using the​ effective-interest amortization method is :
A. Date Accounts and Explanation Debit Credit Interest Expense 23,735 Discount on Bonds Payable 235 Cash 23,500
B. Date Accounts and Explanation Debit Credit Interest Expense 27,307 Discount on Bonds Payable 3,807 Cash 23,500
C. Date Accounts and Explanation Debit Credit Interest Expense 24,957 Discount on Bonds Payable 3,807 Cash 21,150
D. Date Accounts and Explanation Debit Credit Interest Expense 21,385 Discount on Bonds Payable 235 Cash 21,150
Business
1 answer:
enyata [817]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

D. Date Accounts and Explanation Debit Credit Interest Expense 21,385 Discount on Bonds Payable 235 Cash 21,150

Explanation:

The journal entry is shown below:

Interest expense $21,385

     To Discount on bond payable $235

     To Cash $21,150

(Being the interest expense is recorded)

The computation is given below:

The interest expense is

=  $470,000 ÷ 100 × 91 × 10% ÷ 12 months × 6 months  

= $21,385

The cash is

= $470,000 × 9% ÷ 12 months × 6 months  

= $21,150

And, the remaining balance is credited to discount on note payable

We simply debited the interest expense as it increased the expenses and credited the cash as it reduced the assets plus the remaining amount is credited to discount on bond payable

You might be interested in
QUICKEST AND BEST ANSWER GETS A FOLLOW AND BRAINLIEST
Bumek [7]
Back in 2015, McDonald’s was struggling. In Europe, sales were down 1.4% across the previous 6 years; 3.3% down in the US and almost 10% down across Africa and the Middle East. There were a myriad of challenges to overcome. Rising expectations of customer experience, new standards of convenience, weak in-store technology, a sprawling menu, a PR-bruised brand and questionable ingredients to name but a few.

McDonald’s are the original fast-food innovators; creating a level of standardisation that is quite frankly, remarkable. Buy a Big Mac in Beijing and it’ll taste the same as in Stratford-Upon Avon.

So when you’ve optimised product delivery, supply chain and flavour experience to such an incredible degree — how do you increase bottom line growth? It’s not going to come from making the Big Mac cheaper to produce — you’ve already turned those stones over (multiple times).

The answer of course, is to drive purchase frequency and increase margins through new products.
Numerous studies have shown that no matter what options are available, people tend to stick with the default options and choices they’ve made habitually. This is even more true when someone faces a broad selection of choices. We try to mitigate the risk of buyers remorse by sticking with the choices we know are ‘safe’.

McDonald’s has a uniquely pervasive presence in modern life with many of us having developed a pattern of ordering behaviour over the course of our lives (from Happy Meals to hangover cures). This creates a unique, and less cited, challenge for McDonald’s’ reinvention: how do you break people out of the default buying behaviours they’ve developed over decades?


In its simplest sense, the new format is designed to improve customer experience, which will in turn drive frequency and a shift in buying behaviour (for some) towards higher margin items. The most important shift in buying patterns is to drive reappraisal of the Signature range to make sure they maximise potential spend from those customers who can afford, and want, a more premium experience.
I hope this was helpful
8 0
3 years ago
The Cutting Department of Sheridan Company has the following production and cost data for July.
alina1380 [7]

Answer:

1.                                                                   Materials       Conversion Costs

Total equivalent units of production        17,200                  15,800  

2. Cost per Equivalent Unit                    $ 4.05                           $ 2.6

Explanation:

Cutting Department

Weighted-Average Method

1. Equivalent Units

Particulars              Units       % of Completion       Equivalent Units

                                     Materials Conversion   Materials Conversion

Transferred Out    13,700     100         100             13,700      13,700

<u>Ending Inventory     3500      100          60             3500        2100    </u>

<u>Total Equivalent Units                                             17,200      15,800  </u>

<em>The Ending Inventory  units are 3500 which are not yet complete. </em>

                                                                   Materials       Conversion Costs

Total equivalent units of production        17,200                  15,800  

2. Cost Per Equivalent Units

                                                    Materials         Conversion

Cost Added                               69,660                18,480 + 22,600

                             

Total Costs                                69,660                  41,080

Equivalent Units                       <u> 17,200                    15,800 </u>

Cost per Equivalent Unit             69,660 / 17,200         41,080/ 15,800  

                                                    $ 4.05                           $ 2.6

Cost of Ending Work In Process  $ 19635

Materials = 3500 * $ 4.05= $ 14175

Conversion = 2100 * $ 2.6=  $ 5460

We multiply the equivalent number of units with the cost per unit to find the cost.

Cost Of Units Transferred Out = $ 91,105

Materials = 13,700 * $ 4.05= $ 55,485

Conversion = 13,700 * $ 2.6 =  $ 35620

B. A Cost Reconciliation Report

                                    Materials              Conversion

Ending WIP                     $ 14175                  $ 5460

<u>Transferred Out             $ 55,485              $ 35620</u>

<u />

<u>Total                                 $ 69660                 41080   </u>

These calculated costs reconcile with the costs given in the above data.

                                                  Materials              Conversion

<u>Cost Added                               69,660                18,480 + 22,600</u>

<u>Total Costs                                69,660                  41,080</u>

<u></u>

These costs reconcile with the given costs.

5 0
3 years ago
To find the annual rate of return on any given stock, add the stock's dividend for the year plus the change in the stock's price
katrin2010 [14]

Answer:

The statement is: True.

Explanation:

The Annual Rate of Return or Yearly Rate of Return is the amount earned over an investment within one year. It is typically represented as a percentage and takes into consideration capital appreciation and the payment of dividends. The formula to calculate the annual rate of return is the following:

Annual Rate of Return = (EYP - BYP)/BYP X 100%

Where:

EYP = End of year price

BYP = Beginning of year price

8 0
3 years ago
Suppose that a demand curve exhibits two points. Initially, at price P 0 P0 , the quantity demanded is Q 0 Q0 . When price chang
Vinvika [58]

Answer:

Price Elasticity of Demand= \frac{Percentage change in Demand}{Percentage change in Price}

At Price = P_{0}

Quantity demanded = Q_{0}

At Price = P_{1}

Quantity Demanded = Q_{1}

Now,

Percentage change in Demand = \frac{(Q_{1} - Q_{0})}{Q_{0}}

Percentage change in Price = \frac{(P_{1} - P_{0})}{P_{0}}

Price Elasticity of Demand = \frac{\frac{(Q_{1} - Q_{0})}{Q_{0}}}{\frac{(P_{1} - P_{0})}{P_{0}}}

Above formula if used will give the correct answer related to Price Elasticity of Demand.

Another variant of above formula is also being used on prominent basis.

Price Elasticity of Demand = \frac{\frac{(Q_{1} - Q_{0})}{(Q_{1} + Q_{0})} }{\frac{(P_{1} - P_{0})}{P_{1} + P_{0}} }

Utilization of any of the above Formula will give the ideal outcome in estimating Price elasticity of demand.

5 0
3 years ago
In a mortgage, the amount of money borrowed is called the_______.
Rashid [163]

No answer choices......




In a mortgage, the amount of money borrowed is called the Loan principal, or just a loan.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The preferred stock of Marble Comics pays annual dividends of ​$2 in perpetuity​ (starting in one​ year). If you buy a preferred
    13·1 answer
  • On January 15, 2019, Dillon purchased the rights to a mineral interest for $3,500,000. At that time, it was estimated that the r
    11·1 answer
  • "A Registered Investment Adviser publishes a web-based newsletter. He is approached by a marketing firm for a list of the RIA's
    9·1 answer
  • Mandy and Jeff have a net worth of $25,000 and total assets of $140,000. If their revolving credit and unpaid bills total $2,200
    7·1 answer
  • The Guitar Shoppe reports the following sales forecast: August, $110,000; September, $190,000. Total sales includes 30% cash sal
    12·1 answer
  • In 1980 Denmark had a GDP of $70 billion (measured in U.S. dollars) and a population of 5.1 million. In 2000, Denmark had a GDP
    6·1 answer
  • Compared to attending a technical school, completing a four-year college degree allows you to
    11·2 answers
  • Suppose the banking system does NOT hold excess reserves and the reserve ratio is 25%. If Melanie deposits $1,000 of cash into h
    9·1 answer
  • How do companies effectively go global?
    14·1 answer
  • What component of GDP would a consumer buying a new house affect?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!