1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]
3 years ago
12

“[A] flat tax is simple, fair, and good for growth. Instead of the 893 forms required by the current system, a flat tax would us

e only two postcard-sized forms. . . . Unlike the current system, which discriminates [treats some people differently] based on the source, use, and level of income, a flat tax treats all taxpayers equally, fulfilling the ‘equal justice under law’ principle. . . . And unlike the current system, which punishes people for contributing to the nation’s wealth, a flat tax would lower . . . tax rates and eliminate [get rid of] the tax bias [discouragement] against saving and investment, thus ensuring better economic performance in a competitive global economy.”
—from “A Brief Guide to the Flat Tax,” The Heritage Foundation, July 7, 2005

(a) What is the author of this excerpt proposing? (b) According to the excerpt, how is the current progressive tax system unfair? (c) How would going to a flat tax system from a progressive tax system change the way income taxes are collected?
History
1 answer:
Fantom [35]3 years ago
3 0

(a) The author of this excerpt is proposing that the flat tax is a simpler system than using 893 forms required by the current system.

(b) The currently system is unfair according to the excerpt, explaining how the current progressive tax system discriminates based on the source, use, and level of income.

(c) Switching from a progressive tax system to a flat tax system would lower tax rates and get rid of tax bias. Which is discouragement against saving and investing. The performance in a competitive global economy will better.

You might be interested in
What is the significance of having three branches of government? Are there advantages if the responsibility to govern is shoulde
lisov135 [29]

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

The significance of having three branches of government is tremendous and can't be overemphasized. Some of the significance includes:

1. It makes the government effective and efficient.

2. Having three branches of government protects the rights of the citizens

3. It prevents arbitrary use of power by the government

Are there advantages if the responsibility to govern is shouldered only by one branch?

No there are no advantages. If any branch of government turned has all the power of the executive, judiciary, and legislative there will eventually be an arbitrary use of power in the long run, and this will affect the citizens and that society at large. This has been proven in human history in the past in the case of the dictator and absolute monarchy.

7 0
2 years ago
List two of the major reasons that constantinople thrived as the capital of the byzantine empire ​
dimulka [17.4K]

Answer:

The Byzantine Empire was the eastern continuation of the Roman Empire after the Western Roman Empire's fall in the fifth century CE. ... Changes: The Byzantine Empire shifted its capital from Rome to Constantinople, changed the official religion to Christianity, and changed the official language from Latin to Greek.

Constantinople sat in the middle of a trade route,sea and land. Its wealth came from trade and its strong military. Constantinople remained secure and prosperous while cities in western Roman empire crumbles.

Explanation:

hopefully this gives you an answer. I'm sorry if it does not help you

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What role did churches play in the growing cities of the late 1800’s?
VMariaS [17]
The YMCA attempted to help industrial workers and urban poor through Bible studies, prayer meetings, citizenship training, and group activities.
3 0
3 years ago
In a speech to the British people near the beginning of World War II, Churchill said the following: Let us brace ourselves to ou
iren [92.7K]

Answer:

Churchill was hoping to encourage the sense of networth among the British people on the need to see to the stopping of Adolf Hitler's aim of conquering and overiding Europe in his march towards dormination.

He was afraid that, If Britain didn't interven, the stigma of not doing anything would alway stick to them as a badge of disgrace. The speech by Churchill was part of the reason while Britian joined the World War 2.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Use the image below to answer the following question:
AVprozaik [17]

Answer:

not sure but i think its d

Explanation:

d. The coronation of a new emperor

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many presidents had unsuccessful assassination attempts on their lives?
    15·1 answer
  • The system of making the loser of the presidential election vice president was ended because:
    8·2 answers
  • 3. Describe the location of the Battle of Antietan.
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following did not encourage assimilation by European immigrants?
    6·1 answer
  • Match each event, piece of legislation, or quote with the president associated with it.
    12·1 answer
  • Does Truman present American policy as offensive or defensive?
    14·1 answer
  • Part B
    11·2 answers
  • How did ancient rome use currency? What was the effect on international trade?
    15·1 answer
  • I need help in this question ​
    6·1 answer
  • Describe the three religions / philosophies of Japan. Who created them?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!