Answer: I would say that it can be a an example of counterculture since it shows different points of view according to different cultural standards.
Explanation:
Scholars such as Joanne Martin and Caren Siehl, deem counterculture and cultural development as "a balancing act, [that] some core values of a counterculture should present a direct challenge to the core values of a dominant culture". Therefore, a prevalent culture and a counterculture should coexist in an uneasy symbiosis, holding opposite positions on valuable issues that are essentially important to each of them. According to this theory, a counterculture can contribute a plethora of useful functions for the prevalent culture, such as "articulating the foundations between appropriate and inappropriate behavior and providing a safe haven for the development of innovative ideas".
Answer:
More, had a comparative advantage, produce more
Explanation:
In the previous example, the United States and Brazil were efficient when they specialized. Brazil choose to specialize in the production of bananas because it in producing it. The United States and Brazil when they specialize.
That statement is False
According to the data from United States' <span>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the percentage of the infertil couple is around 12%.
Which means that if it converted into a fraction, it would be around 1 in 8 couples, Not 1 in 4.</span>
The most important benefits were cost reduction, increasing patient satisfaction, increasing home care and outpatient services. The most important disadvantage included reducing access, reducing the rate of hospital admissions and increasing employees' workload and dissatisfaction.
