Answer:
The need for organisations (which may be governmental or non-governmental) to improve the condition of living of people and protect their environment whilst they pursue increased profitability has been termed
The Triple Bottomline.
It is also referred to by economists as the 3P - People, Planet and Profit.
It speaks to the fact that other than the usual making financial success the sole metric of measurement by which organisations are evaluated, their impact on people and the environment should be considered as well.
In simple terms, a firm should be termed more successful than others if it's activities besides being profitable also impacts positively on people and protects if not improves the environment.
Cheers!
Answer:
the total cost of ordering and holding sugar is $1,000 per year
Explanation:
<em>Step 1 Calculate the Economic Order Quantity(EOQ).</em>
EOQ = √(2×Total Demand×Ordering cost)/ Holding Cost per Unit
= √(2×250×20×5)/20
= 50
<em>Step 2 Calculate the total cost of ordering and holding sugar</em>
Total cost = Ordering Cost + Holding Cost
= (250×20)/50 × $5 + 50/2 × $20
= $500+$500
= $1,000
Therefore, the total cost of ordering and holding sugar is $1,000 per year
Answer:
The correct answer is: may have equal or increasing amounts applied to the principal from each loan payment.
Explanation:
Amortization can be defined as the process of spreading out the loan in monthly payments. An amortized loan has scheduled periodic payments for both interests as well as principal. If the payments for each period are equal it is called a fully amortized loan.
In amortized loans the interest is paid off first then the amount excess of interest reduces the principal. A common example of amortized loans is auto loans, home loans.
The payments for amortized loans can be equal or unequal for each period.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Beck was the general manager of company. By signing the company's document, actually company is liable to pay that amount not individual. The claim that Haines make is incorrect as any liability is supposed to be beared by company. The claim that Beck made is correct. because he wrote general manager which means he is an employee of that company. So, liability falls on company rather than individual.
